Gifted Parents: The Impact of Giftedness on Parenting Cultures in the United States, 1920-1960
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Probolus, KimberlyEditorial
Universidad de Granada
Materia
Giftedness Intelligence Merit Inequality Parenting
Fecha
2020-12-31Referencia bibliográfica
Probolus, K. «Gifted Parents». Dynamis: Acta Hispanica Ad Medicinae Scientiarumque Historiam Illustrandam, Vol. 40, Núm. 2, octubre de 2021, p. 325-47 [http://dx.doi.org/10.30827/dynamis.v40i2.17969]
Resumen
This paper explores how discourses of giftedness informed attitudes towards
parenting in the United States from 1920 to 1960. Using psychologists’ studies of giftedness,
media coverage of the topic, and guidebooks for parents of gifted children, I argue that giftedness
emerged in the 1910s, and by the 1920s addressed a newly limited definition of intelligence
and problems in urban public education, coinciding with the popularity of the culture and
personality school. Scholarly debates about giftedness traveled from the academy to the wider
public through the media and guidebooks for parents. Media coverage brought awareness
of the problem of the neglected gifted student, and guidebooks offered parents practical
suggestions about how to raise gifted children. I show that the discourse contributed to racial
segregation in American schools and classrooms by using merit to determine access to educational
opportunity. Experts’ advice about giftedness also altered expectations about childrearing
and encouraged parents to become more involved in their child’s educational development.
This argument puts the history of psychology in conversation with histories of parenting, and
it evidences how the discourse on giftedness impacted institutional inequality both through
merit-based gifted and talented programs and by impacting ideologies of parenting. Thus, I
provide a more comprehensive account of how and why giftedness profoundly shaped both
the school and the home. This article considers the cultural work the discourse accomplished; it
gave the public the impression that disparities in educational achievement between individuals
and groups could be explained by the parenting a child received, putting significant pressure
on all parents to make educational achievement a top priority for their child.