Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPetrova, Dafina 
dc.contributor.authorCruz, Maite
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Pérez, María José 
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-01T07:33:59Z
dc.date.available2022-03-01T07:33:59Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-11
dc.identifier.citationDafina Petrova, Maite Cruz, María-José Sánchez, BRCA1/2 testing for genetic susceptibility to cancer after 25 years: A scoping review and a primer on ethical implications, The Breast, Volume 61, 2022, Pages 66-76, ISSN 0960-9776, [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2021.12.005]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10481/73039
dc.descriptionDafina Petrova is supported by a Juan de la Cierva Fellowship from the Ministry of Science and the National Research Agency of Spain (MCIN/AEI, JC2019-039691-I, https://doi.org/10.13039/501100011033).es_ES
dc.description.abstractBackground: Mutations in the genes called BRCA1 and BRCA2 are associated with significantly elevated lifetime risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer. This year marks 25 years since genetic tests for BRCA1/2 mutations became available to the public. Currently, comprehensive guidelines exist regarding BRCA1/2 testing and preventive measures in mutation carriers. As such, BRCA1/2 testing represents a precedent not only in genetic testing and management of genetic cancer risk, but also in bioethics. The goal of the current research was to offer a review and an ethical primer of the main ethical challenges related to BRCA testing. Method: A systematic scoping review was undertaken following the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Four databases were searched and 18 articles that met the inclusion criteria were synthetized narratively into a conceptual map. Results: Ethical discussions revolved around the BRCA1/2 gene discovery, how tests are distributed for clinical use, the choice to undergo testing, unresolved issues in receiving and disclosing test results, reproductive decision-making, and culture-specific ethics. Several unique properties of the latest developments in testing circumstances (e.g., incorporation of BRCA1/2 testing in multi-gene or whole genome sequence panels and tests sold directly to consumers) significantly raised the complexity of ethical debates. Conclusions: Multidisciplinary ethical discussion is necessary to guide not only individual decision making but also societal practices and medical guidelines in light of the new technologies available and the latest results regarding psychological, social, and health outcomes in cancer previvors and survivors affected by BRCA mutations.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipJuan de la Cierva Fellowship from the Ministry of Sciencees_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Research Agency of Spain (MCIN/AEI) JC2019-039691-Ies_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.titleBRCA1/2 testing for genetic susceptibility to cancer after 25 years: A scoping review and a primer on ethical implicationses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.breast.2021.12.005
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España