Seeding or planting to revegetate the world's degraded land: Systematic review and experimentation to address methodological issues
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Leverkus, Alexandro B.; Lázaro González, Alba; Castro Gutiérrez, Jorge; Jiménez Morales, María Noelia; Navarro, Francisco B.Editorial
Wiley
Materia
Afforestation Assisted regeneration Nursery cultivation Reforestation Sowing Systematic review protocol
Fecha
2021-02-21Referencia bibliográfica
Leverkus, A.B... [et al.] (2021), Seeding or planting to revegetate the world's degraded land: systematic review and experimentation to address methodological issues. Restor Ecol, 29: e13372. [https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13372]
Patrocinador
RTI2018-096187-J-100 from FEDER/Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades; AVA201601.19 (NUTERA-DE), AVA2019.004 (NUTERADE II) co-financed (80%) by the FEDER Program; P18-RT-1927 from Consejería de Economía, Conocimiento, y Universidad de la Junta de Andalucía, also co-financed by the FEDER programResumen
Revegetation is key to achieve the goals of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. For many situations and plant species,
selecting direct seeding or planting can define revegetation success. However, there is no clarity about when one method should
be preferred over the other, partly driven by methodological difficulties that preclude avoiding bias during experimentation. To
move the debate forward, (1) we propose a systematic review of the studies that compare seeding and planting, including how
they have handled bias; and (2) we describe an ongoing experiment that tests different ways to handle bias when comparing
seeding with planting.