Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
The effect of two retraining programs, barefoot running vs increasing cadence, on kinematic parameters: A randomized controlled trial
dc.contributor.author | Molina Molina, Alejandro | |
dc.contributor.author | Mercado Palomino, Elia | |
dc.contributor.author | Delgado García, Gabriel | |
dc.contributor.author | Soto Hermoso, Víctor Manuel | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-25T07:59:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-25T07:59:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-10-30 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Molina-Molina, A... [et al.]. The effect of two retraining programs, barefoot running vs increasing cadence, on kinematic parameters: A randomized controlled trial. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021; 00: 1– 10. [https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.14091] | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10481/71740 | |
dc.description | The authors would like to acknowledge the study participants involved in recruitment and the coaches who contributed to the implementation of the running retraining programs. Funding for open access charge: Universidad de Granada/CBUA. | es_ES |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two 10-week non-laboratory- based running retraining programs on foot kinematics and spatiotemporal parameters in recreational runners. One hundred and three recreational runners (30 ± 7.2 years old, 39% females) were randomly assigned to either: a barefoot retraining group (BAR) with 3 sessions/week over 10 weeks, a cadence retraining group (CAD) who increased cadence by 10% again with 3 sessions/week over 10 weeks and a control group (CON) who did not perform any retraining. The footstrike pattern, footstrike angle (FSA), and spatial-temporal variables at comfortable and high speeds were measured using 2D/3D photogrammetry and a floor-based photocell system. A 3 × 2 ANOVA was used to compare between the groups and 2 time points. The FSA significantly reduced at the comfortable speed by 5.81° for BAR (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.749) and 4.81° for CAD (p = 0.002; Cohen's d = 0.638), and at high speed by 6.54° for BAR (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.753) and by 4.71° for CAD (p = 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.623). The cadence significantly increased by 2% in the CAD group (p = 0.015; Cohen's d = 0.344) at comfortable speed and the BAR group showed a 1.7% increase at high speed. BAR and CAD retraining programs showed a moderate effect for reducing FSA and rearfoot prevalence, and a small effect for increasing cadence. Both offer low-cost and feasible tools for gait modification within recreational runners in clinical scenarios. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | Universidad de Granada/CBUA | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | John Wiley & Sons | es_ES |
dc.rights | Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ | * |
dc.subject | Gait retraining | es_ES |
dc.subject | Metronome | es_ES |
dc.subject | Running form | es_ES |
dc.subject | Step rate | es_ES |
dc.subject | Unshod | es_ES |
dc.title | The effect of two retraining programs, barefoot running vs increasing cadence, on kinematic parameters: A randomized controlled trial | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/sms.14091 | |
dc.type.hasVersion | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |