Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorCarril Caccia, Federico 
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-24T11:45:58Z
dc.date.available2021-11-24T11:45:58Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-28
dc.identifier.citationCarril-Caccia, F., Paniagua, J., & Requena, F. (2021). Asylum Migration, Borders, and Terrorism in a Structural Gravity Model. Politics and Governance, 9(4), 146-158. doi:[https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i4.4438]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10481/71717
dc.descriptionThis article has benefited from very helpful comments from two anonymous reviewers and the Academic Editor Inmaculada Martinez. The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from Junta de Andalucia (SEJ 413), from Generalitat Valenciana (GV Prometeo 2018/102 and GV/2020/012), the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (RTI2018-100899-B-I00, co-financed with FEDER), and the Kellogg Institute for International Studies (University of Notre Dame).es_ES
dc.description.abstractIn this article, we examine the impact of terrorist attacks on asylum‐related migration flows. So far, the literature that examines the “push factors” such as terrorism that explain forced migration has omitted the fact that the vast majority of people forced to flee typically do so toward other locations within the country. The novel feature of our research is the estimation of a structural gravity equation that includes both international migration and internally displaced persons (IDP), a theoretically consistent framework that allows us to identify country‐specific variables such as terror attacks. For that purpose, we use information on the number of asylum applications, the number of IDP, and the number of terrorist attacks in each country for a sample of 119 origin developing countries and 141 destination countries over 2009–2018. The empirical results reveal several interesting and policy‐relevant traits. Firstly, forced migration abroad is still minimal compared to IDP, but globalization forces are pushing up the ratio. Secondly, terror violence has a positive and significant effect on asylum migration flows relative to the number of IDP. Thirdly, omitting internally displaced people biases downward the impact of terrorism on asylum applications. Fourthly, we observe regional heterogeneity in the effect of terrorism on asylum migration flows; in Latin America, terrorist attacks have a much larger impact on the number of asylum applications relative to IDP than in Asia or Africa.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipJunta de Andalucia SEJ 413es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipGeneralitat Valenciana European Commission General Electric GV Prometeo 2018/102 GV/2020/012es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipSpanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (FEDER) RTI2018-100899-B-I00es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipKellogg Institute for International Studies (University of Notre Dame)es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherCogitatioes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectAsylum migrationes_ES
dc.subjectForced migrationes_ES
dc.subjectInternally displaced personses_ES
dc.subjectStructural gravityes_ES
dc.subjectTerrorism es_ES
dc.titleAsylum Migration, Borders, and Terrorism in a Structural Gravity Modeles_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.17645/pag.v9i4.4438
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

[PDF]

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Atribución 3.0 España
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Atribución 3.0 España