Isokinetic force-power profile of the shoulder joint in males participating in CrossFit training and competing at different levels
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemEditorial
PeerJ
Materia
Injuries Strength training Resistance training Human physical conditioning Sports Plyometric exercise Athletic performance Physical education and training Exercise therapy Return to sport
Fecha
2021-09-17Referencia bibliográfica
Torres-Banduc MA... [et al.] 2021. Isokinetic force-power profile of the shoulder joint in males participating in CrossFit training and competing at different levels. PeerJ 9:e11643 DOI [10.7717/peerj.11643]
Resumen
Background: As participants who engage in CrossFit training and competition
perform a large volume of high intensity overhead activities, injuries to the shoulder
are one of the most common in this sport. Previous research in other sports has
indicated that the isokinetic force power profile of the shoulder joint (IPSJ) rotator
muscles may assist in the prediction of shoulder injury.
Aim: Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the IPSJ in males
engaged in CrossFit training at different competitive levels.
Methods: In a cross-sectional study design, participants (age, 24.1 ± 2.7 years)
classified as ‘beginner’ (n = 6), ‘intermediate’ (n = 7) or ‘advanced’ (n = 9) provided
informed consent to participate in this study. The IPSJ assessment involved
rotational and diagonal movements, including internal and external shoulder rotator
muscles, at both 180 .s−1 and 300 .s−1. The variables analysed were peak torque/body
mass (%), mean power (W) and the external/internal peak torque/body mass
ratio (%). A Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare the IPSJ of the three groups,
with Dunn’s test used for post-hoc analysis. The alpha level was set at p < 0.05.
Results: The IPSJ showed greater torque and power values in those who
competed at the advanced level as compared to those at a lower competitive level
(i.e. intermediate, beginner). This was observed mainly for the internal rotation and
internal diagonal movements at both 180 .s−1 and 300 .s−1. However, such
differences between competitive levels were, in general, absent for the external
rotation and external diagonal movements. Moreover, the participants from the
advanced competitive level exhibited an imbalance of peak torque between the muscles responsible for the external–internal rotational and external-internal
diagonal movements of the shoulder (i.e. peak torque external/internal ratio <66%),
particularly in the dominant shoulder.
Conclusion: These findings suggest greater development of the shoulder internal
rotators and a higher probability of shoulder injury in CrossFit athletes at the
advanced competitive level. Based on these results, participants engaged in CrossFit
training and competition may wish to increase the volume of training for the
shoulder external rotator muscles to complement the large increases in shoulder
internal rotator strength that occur as a part of their regular training regimes.