Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGreen, L.
dc.contributor.authorSaeed Khan, Khalid 
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-08T09:27:09Z
dc.date.available2021-11-08T09:27:09Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-20
dc.identifier.citationGreen, L... [et al.] (2021), Early cryoprecipitate transfusion versus standard care in severe postpartum haemorrhage: a pilot cluster-randomised trial. Anaesthesia. [https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15595]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10481/71353
dc.descriptionThe trial was prospectively registered on ISRCTN (12146519). The trial was approved by the NHS LondonBrighton and Sussex Research Ethics Committee and the NHS Confidentiality Advisory Group. The study was funded by Barts Charity. We would like to acknowledge the support of the Joint Research Management Office, Queen Mary University of London as sponsor for the study; the contributions of members of Katie's Team, the East London women's health research patient and public advisory group; and the clinical, laboratory and maternity research teams at Barts Health NHS Trust hospitals and Homerton University Hospital. We are also grateful for all the support and advice provided by the project steering committee chaired by an independent consultant anaesthetist (M. Wilson, University of Sheffield), with four other independent members: A. Khalil, St George's University Hospital; B. Leurent, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; N. Moss, lay representative; and S. Robinson, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust. No other external funding or competing interests declared.es_ES
dc.description.abstractThere is a lack of evidence evaluating cryoprecipitate transfusion in severe postpartum haemorrhage. We performed a pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial to evaluate the feasibility of a trial on early cryoprecipitate delivery in severe postpartum haemorrhage. Pregnant women (>24 weeks gestation), actively bleeding within 24 h of delivery and who required at least one unit of red blood cells were eligible. Women declining transfusion in advance or with inherited clotting deficiencies were not eligible. Four UK hospitals were randomly allocated to deliver either the intervention (administration of two pools of cryoprecipitate within 90 min of first red blood cell unit requested plus standard care), or the control group treatment (standard care, where cryoprecipitate is administered later or not at all). The primary outcome was the proportion of women who received early cryoprecipitate (intervention) vs. standard care (control). Secondary outcomes included consent rates, acceptability of the intervention, safety outcomes and preliminary clinical outcome data to inform a definitive trial. Between March 2019 and January 2020, 199 participants were recruited; 19 refused consent, leaving 180 for analysis (110 in the intervention and 70 in the control group). Adherence to assigned treatment was 32% (95%CI 23–41%) in the intervention group vs. 81% (95%CI 70–90%) in the control group. The proportion of women receiving cryoprecipitate at any time-point was higher in the intervention (60%) vs. control (31%) groups; the former had fewer red blood cell transfusions at 24 h (mean difference 0.6 units, 95%CI 1.2 to 0); overall surgical procedures (odds ratio 0.6, 95%CI 0.3–1.1); and intensive care admissions (odds ratio 0.4, 95%CI 0.1–1.1). There was no increase in serious adverse or thrombotic events in the intervention group. Staff interviews showed that lack of awareness and uncertainty about study responsibilities contributed to lower adherence in the intervention group. We conclude that a full-scale trial may be feasible, provided that protocol revisions are put in place to establish clear lines of communication for ordering early cryoprecipitate in order to improve adherence. Preliminary clinical outcomes associated with cryoprecipitate administration are encouraging and merit further investigation.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipBarts Charityes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipJoint Research Management Office, Queen Mary University of Londones_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sonses_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectHaematological agentses_ES
dc.subjectHaemostaticses_ES
dc.subjectPilot projectses_ES
dc.subjectPostpartum haemorrhagees_ES
dc.titleEarly cryoprecipitate transfusion versus standard care in severe postpartum haemorrhage: a pilot cluster-randomised triales_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/anae.15595
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España