Assessing Willingness to Engage in Risky Driving Behaviour Using Naturalistic Driving Footage: The Role of Age and Gender
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemEditorial
MDPI
Materia
Risk estimation Risk appraisal Decision making Age Gender Driving experience
Fecha
2021Referencia bibliográfica
Ventsislavova, P.; Crundall, D.; Garcia-Fernandez, P.; Castro, C. Assessing Willingness to Engage in Risky Driving Behaviour Using Naturalistic Driving Footage: The Role of Age and Gender. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 10227. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph181910227
Patrocinador
Spanish Government: Ministry of Science and Innovation (PID2020-113978RB-I00)Resumen
Young novice drivers are more prone than older drivers to get involved in a risky driving
situation. Some young drivers underestimate risk while overestimating their driving abilities,
increasing the likelihood of engaging in risky behaviour. Age and inexperience both influence risk
estimation, though it is not clear which of these variables is more important. Can drivers’ willingness
to engage in risky behaviour be assessed in a similar way to hazard perception skill using videobased risky situations? The aim of the current study was to assess whether a video-based tool could
measure the willingness to participate in risky driving situations and whether it can distinguish
between different types of risky driving scenarios across gender and driver age groups. We also
explored the moderating effect of age and gender on drivers’ experience in relation to the risky
manoeuvres and participants’ willingness to engage in risky situations. Participants were presented
with naturalistic videos from the perspective of the driver that contained active risky situations
(result of driver’s own actions) and were asked to make a decision regarding a potential action (to
overtake a bus/bicycle or pass through an amber light) and whether they would accelerate at this
point. Participants reported that they were more willing to accelerate and overtake cyclists and buses
and less willing to pass a light in amber. Young drivers were more willing to both engage in the risky
behaviours and accelerate than older drivers, with young males reporting higher scores than the
other groups. Gender differences were observed, with males being more prone to overtake and pass
through a light in amber than females; however, this difference was not observed for the intention
to accelerate. All the above effects remained when we tested the impact of experience on decision
making while controlling for age and gender, although driving experience was no longer significant.
These results demonstrate that drivers’ intention to assume risk can indeed be measured in a similar
video-based methodology to that used by hazard perception tests. The findings raise the possibility
of assessing and training drivers on a wider range of safety-related behaviours.