Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorFernández Aguilar, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorMartín Martín, José Jesús 
dc.contributor.authorMinué Lorenzo, Sergio
dc.contributor.authorFernández Ajuria, Alberto
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-29T08:26:14Z
dc.date.available2021-09-29T08:26:14Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-09
dc.identifier.citationFernández-Aguilar, C... [et al.]. Use of heuristics during the clinical decision process from family care physicians in real conditions. J Eval Clin Pract. 2021; 1- 7. [https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13608]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10481/70518
dc.descriptionHealth Research Fund of the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Grant/Award Numbers: PI13/01175, PI10/01468; Funding for open access charge: Universidad de Granada/CBUAes_ES
dc.description.abstractRationale aims and objectives: The available evidence on the use of heuristics and their relationship with diagnostic error in primary care is very limited. The aim of the study is to identify the use of unknown thought and specifically the possible use of Representativeness, Availability and overconfidence heuristics in the clinical practice of primary care physicians in cases of dyspnoea and to analyse their possible relationship with diagnostic error. Methods: A total of 371 patients consulting with new episodes of dyspnoea in Primary Care centres in Spain were registered. Based on specific operational definitions, the use of unconscious thinking and the use of heuristics during the diagnostic process were assessed. Subsequently, the association between their use and diagnostic error was analysed. Results: In 49.6% of cases, the confirmatory diagnosis coincided with the first diagnostic impression, suggesting the use of the representativeness heuristic in the diagnostic decision process. In 82.3% of the cases, the confirmatory diagnosis was among the three diagnostic hypotheses that were first identified by the general physicians, suggesting a possible use of the availability heuristic. In more than 50% of the cases, the physicians were overconfident in the certainty of their own diagnosis. Finally, a diagnostic error was identified in 9.9% of the recorded cases and no statistically significant correlation was found between the use of some unconscious thinking tools (such as the use of heuristics) and the diagnostic error. Conclusion: Unconscious thinking manifested through the acceptance of the first diagnostic impression and the use of heuristics is commonly used by primary care physicians in the clinical decision process in the face of new episodes of dyspnoea; however, its influence on diagnostic error is not significant. The proposed explicit and reproducible methodology may inspire further studies to confirm these results.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipHealth Research Fund of the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness PI13/01175 PI10/01468es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishinges_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectHeuristicses_ES
dc.subjectHealth economicses_ES
dc.subjectMedical errores_ES
dc.titleUse of heuristics during the clinical decision process from family care physicians in real conditionses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jep.13608
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España