Activity-related typologies and longitudinal change in physical activity and sedentary time in children and adolescents: The UP&DOWN Study
Metadatos
Afficher la notice complèteEditorial
Elsevier
Materia
Behavior change Physical activity Sedentary behavior Typologies Youth
Date
2020-02-12Referencia bibliográfica
Kate Parker... [et al.]. Activity-related typologies and longitudinal change in physical activity and sedentary time in children and adolescents: The UP&DOWN Study, Journal of Sport and Health Science, Volume 10, Issue 4, 2021, Pages 447-453, ISSN 2095-2546, [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2020.02.004]
Patrocinador
National Plan for Research, Development and Innovation (RDi) Ministry of Science and Innovation DEP 2010-21662-C04-00; "Juan de la Cierva" postdoctoral fellowship from the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry, and Competitiveness FJCI-2015-25867; Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness RTI2018-095284-J-100; Spanish Government RYC2019-027287-IRésumé
Background: Children and adolescents can be distinguished by different typologies (clusters) of physical activity and sedentary behavior. How
physical activity and sedentary behaviors change over time within different typologies is not known. This study examined longitudinal changes
in physical activity and sedentary time among children and adolescents with different baseline typologies of activity-related behavior.
Methods: In this longitudinal study (3 annual time points) of children (n = 600, age = 9.2 § 0.4 years (mean § SD), 50.3% girls) and adolescents
(n = 1037, age = 13.6 § 1.7 years, 48.4% girls), participants were recruited in Spain in 2011 2012. Latent class analyses identified typologies
based on self-reported screen, educational, social and relaxing sedentary behaviors, active travel, muscle strengthening activity, and sport at
baseline. Within each typology, linear mixed growth models explored longitudinal changes in accelerometer-derived moderate-to-vigorous physical
activity and sedentary time, as well as time by class interactions.
Results: Three typologies were identified among children (“social screenies”, 12.8%; “exercisers”, 61.5%; and “non-sporty active commuters”,
25.7%) and among adolescents (“active screenies”, 43.5%; “active academics”, 35.0%; and “non-sporty active commuters”, 21.5%) at baseline.
Sedentary time increased within each typology among children and adolescents, with no significant differences between typologies. No changes
in physical activity were found in any typology among children. In adolescents, physical activity declined within all typologies, with “non-sporty
active commuters” declining significantly more than “active screenies” over 3 years.
Conclusion: These results support the need for intervention to promote physical activity and prevent increases in sedentary time during childhood and adolescence.
Adolescents characterized as “non-sporty active commuters” may require specific interventions to maintain their physical activity over time.