Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorPacheco, Francisca
dc.contributor.authorCaparrós González, Rafael Arcángel 
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-16T10:16:33Z
dc.date.available2021-09-16T10:16:33Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-08
dc.identifier.citationFrancisca Pacheco... [et al.]. Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation in decreasing depression symptoms during the peripartum period: A systematic review, Journal of Psychiatric Research, Volume 140, 2021, Pages 443-460, ISSN 0022-3956, [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.06.005]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10481/70228
dc.descriptionAna Osorio received financial support from CAPES/Proex (grant no. 0653/2018). Ana Osorio and Ana Ganho-Avila received support from CAPES/PrInt (grant no. 88887.310343/2018-00).es_ES
dc.description.abstractBackground: Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques have been suggested as alternative treatments to decrease depression symptoms during the perinatal period. These include brain stimulation techniques that do not require surgery and that are nonpharmacological and non-psychotherapeutic. NIBS with evidence of antidepressant effects include repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial electric stimulation (TES) and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Objectives: This systematic review aims to summarize evidence on NIBS efficacy, safety and acceptability in treating peripartum depression (PPD). Methods: We included randomized, non-randomized and case reports, that used NIBS during pregnancy and the postpartum. The reduction of depressive symptoms and neonatal safety were the primary and co-primary outcomes, respectively. Results: rTMS shows promising results for the treatment of PPD, with clinically significant decreases in depressive symptoms between baseline and end of treatment and overall good acceptability. Although the safety profile for rTMS is adequate in the postpartum, caution is warranted during pregnancy. In TES, evidence on efficacy derives mostly from single-arm studies, compromising the encouraging findings. Further investigation is necessary concerning ECT, as clinical practice relies on clinical experience and is only described in low-quality case-reports. Limitations: The reduced number of controlled studies, the lack of complete datasets and the serious/high risk of bias of the reports warrant cautious interpretations. Conclusions and implications: Existing evidence is limited across NIBS techniques; comparative studies are lacking, and standard stimulation parameters are yet to be established. Although rTMS benefits from the most robust research, future multicenter randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the position of each NIBS strategy within the pathways of care.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) 0653/2018es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipCAPES/PrInt 88887.310343/2018-00es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectPeripartumes_ES
dc.subjectPerinatales_ES
dc.subjectDepressiones_ES
dc.subjectNon-invasive brain stimulationes_ES
dc.subjectSystematic reviewes_ES
dc.titleEfficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation in decreasing depression symptoms during the peripartum period: A systematic reviewes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.06.005
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

[PDF]

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España