Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorMühlen, Jan M.
dc.contributor.authorMolina García, Pablo 
dc.contributor.authorOrtega Porcel, Francisco Bartolomé 
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-29T10:43:33Z
dc.date.available2021-07-29T10:43:33Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-04
dc.identifier.citationMühlen JM... [et al.]. Br J Sports Med 2021;55:767–779. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-103148]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10481/69978
dc.descriptionJMM is partly funded by Private Stiftung Ewald Marquardt fur Wissenschaft und Technik, Kunst und Kultur. UE and JS are partly funded by the Research Council of Norway (249932/F20). ELS is supported by TrygFonden (grant number 310081). PBJ is supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (SFRH/BPD/115977/2016). PMG and FBO are supported by grants from the MINECO/FEDER (DEP2016-79512-R) and from the University of Granada, Plan Propio de Investigacion 2016, Excellence actions: Units of Excellence; Scientific Excellence Unit on Exercise and Health (UCEES); Junta de Andalucia, Consejeria de Conocimiento, Investigacion y Universidades and European Regional Development Funds (ref. SOMM17/6107/UGR). WJ is partly funded by Science Foundation Ireland (12/RC/2289_P2). AG is supported a European Research Council Grant (grant number 716657). This research was partly funded by Huawei Technologies, Finland.es_ES
dc.description.abstractAssessing vital signs such as heart rate (HR) by wearable devices in a lifestyle-related environment provides widespread opportunities for public health related research and applications. Commonly, consumer wearable devices assessing HR are based on photoplethysmography (PPG), where HR is determined by absorption and reflection of emitted light by the blood. However, methodological differences and shortcomings in the validation process hamper the comparability of the validity of various wearable devices assessing HR. Towards Intelligent Health and Well-Being: Network of Physical Activity Assessment (INTERLIVE) is a joint European initiative of six universities and one industrial partner. The consortium was founded in 2019 and strives towards developing best-practice recommendations for evaluating the validity of consumer wearables and smartphones. This expert statement presents a best-practice validation protocol for consumer wearables assessing HR by PPG. The recommendations were developed through the following multi-stage process: (1) a systematic literature review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, (2) an unstructured review of the wider literature pertaining to factors that may introduce bias during the validation of these devices and (3) evidence-informed expert opinions of the INTERLIVE Network. A total of 44 articles were deemed eligible and retrieved through our systematic literature review. Based on these studies, a wider literature review and our evidence-informed expert opinions, we propose a validation framework with standardised recommendations using six domains: considerations for the target population, criterion measure, index measure, testing conditions, data processing and the statistical analysis. As such, this paper presents recommendations to standardise the validity testing and reporting of PPG-based HR wearables used by consumers. Moreover, checklists are provided to guide the validation protocol development and reporting. This will ensure that manufacturers, consumers, healthcare providers and researchers use wearables safely and to its full potential.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipPrivate Stiftung Ewald Marquardt fur Wissenschaft und Technik, Kunst und Kultures_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipResearch Council of Norway 249932/F20es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipTrygFonden 310081es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipPortuguese Foundation for Science and Technology SFRH/BPD/115977/2016es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipMINECO/FEDER DEP2016-79512-Res_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Granada, Plan Propio de Investigacion 2016, Excellence actions: Units of Excellencees_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific Excellence Unit on Exercise and Health (UCEES)es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Commission SOMM17/6107/UGRes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipScience Foundation Irelandes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Commission 12/RC/2289_P2es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Research Council (ERC) European Commission 716657es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipHuawei Technologieses_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipJunta de Andaluciaes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherBMJes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/*
dc.titleRecommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable heart rate devices: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE Networkes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/716657es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bjsports-2020-103148
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

[PDF]

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Atribución-NoComercial 3.0 España
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Atribución-NoComercial 3.0 España