Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Disadvantageous decision-making as a predictor of drop-out among cocaine-dependent individuals in long-term residential treatment
dc.contributor.author | Stevens, Laura | |
dc.contributor.author | Betanzos Espinosa, Patricia | |
dc.contributor.author | Vergara Moragues, Esperanza | |
dc.contributor.author | Lozano, Óscar | |
dc.contributor.author | González Saiz, Francisco | |
dc.contributor.author | Verdejo García, Antonio Javier | |
dc.contributor.author | Pérez García, Miguel | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-21T08:26:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-21T08:26:25Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013-11-15 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Stevens L, Betanzos-Espinosa P, Crunelle CL, Vergara-Moragues E, Roeyers H, Lozano O, Dom G, Gonzalez-Saiz F, Vanderplasschen W, Verdejo-García A and Pérez-García M (2013) Disadvantageous decision-making as a predictor of drop-out among cocaine-dependent individuals in long-term residential treatment. Front. Psychiatry 4:149. doi: [10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00149] | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10481/68608 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The treatment of cocaine-dependent individuals (CDI) is substantially challenged by high drop-out rates, raising questions regarding contributing factors. Recently, a number of studies have highlighted the potential of greater focus on the clinical significance of neurocognitive impairments in treatment-seeking cocaine users. In the present study, we hypothesized that disadvantageous decision-making would be one such factor placing CDI at greater risk for treatment drop-out. Methods: In order to explore this hypothesis, the present study contrasted baseline performance (at treatment onset) on two validated tasks of decision-making, the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and the Cambridge GambleTask (CGT) in CDI who completed treatment in a residentialTherapeutic Community (TC) (N=66) and those who dropped out ofTC prematurely (N=84). Results: Compared to treatment completers, CDI who dropped out ofTC prematurely did not establish a consistent and advantageous response pattern as the IGT progressed and exhibited a poorer ability to choose the most likely outcome on the CGT. There were no group differences in betting behavior. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that neurocognitive rehabilitation of disadvantageous decision-making may have clinical benefits in CDI admitted to long-term residential treatment programs. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation | es_ES |
dc.rights | Atribución 3.0 España | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/ | * |
dc.subject | Decision-making | es_ES |
dc.subject | Drop-out | es_ES |
dc.subject | Treatment retention | es_ES |
dc.subject | Addiction treatment outcomes | es_ES |
dc.subject | Cocaine dependence | es_ES |
dc.title | Disadvantageous decision-making as a predictor of drop-out among cocaine-dependent individuals in long-term residential treatment | es_ES |
dc.type | journal article | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | open access | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00149 | |
dc.type.hasVersion | VoR | es_ES |