Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGailani, Hassan Faez Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorBenavides Reyes, Cristina 
dc.contributor.authorBolaños Carmona, María Victoria 
dc.contributor.authorRosel Gallardo, Eva María
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Villafranca, Purificación
dc.contributor.authorGonzález López, Santiago 
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-03T09:06:49Z
dc.date.available2021-05-03T09:06:49Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-26
dc.identifier.citationGailani, H.F.A.; Benavides- Reyes, C.; Bolaños-Carmona, M.V.; Rosel-Gallardo, E.; González- Villafranca, P.; González-López, S. Effect of Two Immediate Dentin Sealing Approaches on Bond Strength of Lava™ CAD/CAM Indirect Restoration. Materials 2021, 14, 1629. [https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14071629]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10481/68270
dc.descriptionThe study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Granada (Spain) (protocol code #1005/CEIH/2019 approved on 13 January 2020).es_ES
dc.descriptionInformed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the studyes_ES
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this work was to compare the micro-tensile bond strength (mu TBS) of CAD/CAM (Computer-Aided Design/ Computer-Aided Manufacturing) specimens cemented with different pairing of adhesives and resin-cements using two Immediate Dentin Dealing (IDS) approaches in comparison with Delay Dentin Sealing (DDS). Coronal dentin from 108 molars were divided into nine groups (n = 12) depending on the adhesive/resin-cement (A-C) assigned. Lava (TM) Ultimate (4 x 10 x 10 mm) was cemented according to different strategies: IDS1(cementation after dentin sealing), DDS (dentin sealing and cementation at 2-weeks), IDS2 (immediate dentin sealing and cementation at 2-weeks). Samples were sectioned and tested until failure to determine the mu TBS. Failure mode was categorized as dentin/cement (DC), at Lava (TM) Ultimate/cement (LC) and hybrid (H). Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests and influence of the type of failure on the mu TBS by survival analysis with competing risk was explored. Mostly, mu TBS values were equal or higher in IDS2 than DDS. In general, A-Cs that showed higher mu TBS, have high percentages of LC failure. Survival analysis with competing risk between DC + H and LC values showed that some A-Cs would significantly increase the mu TBS values for IDS2. A-Cs with the highest adhesion values showed a high percentage of fractures at the LC interface, suggesting that the adhesion at the adhesive/dentin interface would be higher.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectIDSes_ES
dc.subjectDDSes_ES
dc.subjectUniversal adhesiveses_ES
dc.subjectSelf-adhesive cementses_ES
dc.subjectCAD/CAM restorationes_ES
dc.titleEffect of Two Immediate Dentin Sealing Approaches on Bond Strength of Lava™ CAD/CAM Indirect Restorationes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ma14071629
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución 3.0 España
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución 3.0 España