Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGalli, Tamas
dc.contributor.authorChiclana Parrilla, Francisco 
dc.contributor.authorSiewe, Francois
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-26T11:19:55Z
dc.date.available2021-04-26T11:19:55Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-08
dc.identifier.citationGalli, T.; Chiclana, F.; Siewe, F. Quality Properties of Execution Tracing, an Empirical Study. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2021, 4, 20. [https://doi.org/10.3390/asi4010020]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10481/68114
dc.descriptionThe authors are grateful to all the professionals who participated in the focus groups; moreover, they also express special thanks to the management of the companies involved for making the organisation of the focus groups possible.es_ES
dc.descriptionData are made available in the appendix including the results of the data coding process.es_ES
dc.description.abstractThe quality of execution tracing impacts the time to a great extent to locate errors in software components; moreover, execution tracing is the most suitable tool, in the majority of the cases, for doing postmortem analysis of failures in the field. Nevertheless, software product quality models do not adequately consider execution tracing quality at present neither do they define the quality properties of this important entity in an acceptable manner. Defining these quality properties would be the first step towards creating a quality model for execution tracing. The current research fills this gap by identifying and defining the variables, i.e., the quality properties, on the basis of which the quality of execution tracing can be judged. The present study analyses the experiences of software professionals in focus groups at multinational companies, and also scrutinises the literature to elicit the mentioned quality properties. Moreover, the present study also contributes to knowledge with the combination of methods while computing the saturation point for determining the number of the necessary focus groups. Furthermore, to pay special attention to validity, in addition to the the indicators of qualitative research: credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability, the authors also considered content, construct, internal and external validity.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Licensees_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectQuality assessmentes_ES
dc.subjectQuality propertieses_ES
dc.subjectExecution tracinges_ES
dc.subjectLogginges_ES
dc.titleQuality Properties of Execution Tracing, an Empirical Studyes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/asi4010020
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License