Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorSerrano Serra, José Pablo
dc.contributor.authorMontero Vilchez, Trinidad
dc.contributor.authorBuendía Eisman, Agustín 
dc.contributor.authorArias Santiago, Salvador Antonio 
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-15T12:23:23Z
dc.date.available2021-03-15T12:23:23Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-22
dc.identifier.citationSerrano-Serra, J.-P.; Montero-Vilchez, T.; Buendia-Eisman, A.; Arias-Santiago, S. Epidermal Barrier Function and Skin Homeostasis in Skin with Permanent and Adhesive Tattoos: A Cross-Sectional Study. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 888. [https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040888]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10481/67232
dc.description.abstractTattoos are a current trend, but their impact on skin homeostasis and epidermal barrier function is not well known. So, the aims of this study are (1) to investigate epidermal barrier function and skin homeostasis in skin with permanent tattoos, adhesive temporary tattoos and non-tattooed skin, and (2) to analyze the effect of petrolatum on skin with permanent and adhesive tattoos. In total, 67 tattoos were enrolled (34 permanent tattoos and 33 adhesive tattoos). Temperature, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), stratum corneum hydration (SCH), erythema and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) were measured in skin with permanent tattoos, adhesive tattoos and non-tattooed skin before and after petrolatum application. The temperature was lower (30.47 C vs. 31.01 C; p = 0.001) on skin with permanent tattoos than non-tattooed skin, while SCH (48.24 Arbitrary Units (AU) vs. 44.15 AU; p = 0.008) was higher. Skin with adhesive tattoos showed lower temperature, SCH (21.19 AU vs. 41.31 AU; p < 0.001) and TAC (1.27 microcoulombs (uC) vs. 3.48 uC; p < 0.001), and higher TEWL (8.65 g/h/m2 vs. 6.99 g/h/m2; p = 0.003), than non-tattooed skin. After petrolatum application, the temperature decreased on skin with permanent tattoos, and TEWL and SCH decreased on skin with adhesive tattoos. Adhesive tattoos may affect skin barrier function, while permanent tattoos may have a lower impact. Tattooed and non-tattooed skin responds in different ways to moisturizers.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMdpies_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectAdhesives es_ES
dc.subjectAntioxidants es_ES
dc.subjectEpidermises_ES
dc.subjectPetrolatumes_ES
dc.subjectSkin barrieres_ES
dc.subjectTattooing es_ES
dc.titleEpidermal Barrier Function and Skin Homeostasis in Skin with Permanent and Adhesive Tattoos: A Cross-Sectional Studyes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jcm10040888
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

[PDF]

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Atribución 3.0 España
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Atribución 3.0 España