Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMartínez García, Dario 
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Perea, Ángela 
dc.contributor.authorChirosa Ríos, Ignacio Jesús 
dc.contributor.authorChirosa Ríos, Luis Javier 
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-12T12:34:19Z
dc.date.available2021-02-12T12:34:19Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationMartinez-Garcia D, Rodriguez-Perea A, Barboza P, Ulloa-Díaz D, Jerez-Mayorga D, Chirosa I, Chirosa Ríos LJ. 2020. Reliability of a standing isokinetic shoulder rotators strength test using a functional electromechanical dynamometer: effects of velocity. PeerJ 8:e9951 http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9951es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10481/66515
dc.description.abstractBackground. The evaluation of the force in internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER) of the shoulder is commonly used to diagnose possible pathologies or disorders in the glenohumeral joint and to assess patient’s status and progression over time. Currently, there is new technology of multiple joint isokinetic dynamometry that allows to evaluate the strength in the human being. The main purpose of this study was to determine the absolute and relative reliability of concentric and eccentric internal and external shoulder rotators with a functional electromechanical dynamometer (FEMD). Methods. Thirty-two male individuals (21.46 ± 2.1 years) were examined of concentric and eccentric strength of shoulder internal and external rotation with a FEMD at velocities of 0.3 m s−1 and 0.6 m s−1 . Relative reliability was determined by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Absolute reliability was quantified by standard error of measurement (SEM) and coefficient of variation (CV). Systematic differences across velocities testing circumstances, were analyzed with dependent t tests or repeatedmeasures analysis of variance in case of two or more than two conditions, respectively. Results. Reliability was high to excellent for IR and ER on concentric and eccentric strength measurements, regardless of velocity used (ICC: 0.81–0.98, CV: 5.12–8.27% SEM: 4.06–15.04N). Concentric outcomes were more reliable than eccentric due to the possible familiarization of the population with the different stimuli. Conclusion. All procedures examined showed high to excellent reliability for clinical use. However, a velocity of 0.60 m s−1 should be recommended for asymptomatic male patients because it demands less time for evaluation and patients find it more comfortable.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherPEERJ INCes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectKinesiology es_ES
dc.subjectIsokinetices_ES
dc.subjectShoulder es_ES
dc.subjectStrengthes_ES
dc.subjectVelocityes_ES
dc.titleReliability of a standing isokinetic shoulder rotators strength test using a functional electromechanical dynamometer: effects of velocityes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.7717/peerj.9951


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 3.0 España
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución 3.0 España