dc.contributor.author | Martínez García, Dario | |
dc.contributor.author | Rodríguez Perea, Ángela | |
dc.contributor.author | Chirosa Ríos, Ignacio Jesús | |
dc.contributor.author | Chirosa Ríos, Luis Javier | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-02-12T12:34:19Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-12T12:34:19Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Martinez-Garcia D, Rodriguez-Perea A, Barboza P, Ulloa-Díaz D, Jerez-Mayorga D, Chirosa I, Chirosa Ríos LJ. 2020. Reliability of a standing isokinetic shoulder rotators strength test using a functional electromechanical dynamometer: effects of velocity. PeerJ 8:e9951 http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9951 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10481/66515 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background. The evaluation of the force in internal rotation (IR) and external rotation
(ER) of the shoulder is commonly used to diagnose possible pathologies or disorders
in the glenohumeral joint and to assess patient’s status and progression over time.
Currently, there is new technology of multiple joint isokinetic dynamometry that allows
to evaluate the strength in the human being. The main purpose of this study was to
determine the absolute and relative reliability of concentric and eccentric internal and
external shoulder rotators with a functional electromechanical dynamometer (FEMD).
Methods. Thirty-two male individuals (21.46 ± 2.1 years) were examined of concentric
and eccentric strength of shoulder internal and external rotation with a FEMD at
velocities of 0.3 m s−1
and 0.6 m s−1
. Relative reliability was determined by intraclass
correlation coefficients (ICC). Absolute reliability was quantified by standard error of
measurement (SEM) and coefficient of variation (CV). Systematic differences across
velocities testing circumstances, were analyzed with dependent t tests or repeatedmeasures analysis of variance in case of two or more than two conditions, respectively.
Results. Reliability was high to excellent for IR and ER on concentric and eccentric
strength measurements, regardless of velocity used (ICC: 0.81–0.98, CV: 5.12–8.27%
SEM: 4.06–15.04N). Concentric outcomes were more reliable than eccentric due to the
possible familiarization of the population with the different stimuli.
Conclusion. All procedures examined showed high to excellent reliability for clinical
use. However, a velocity of 0.60 m s−1
should be recommended for asymptomatic
male patients because it demands less time for evaluation and patients find it more
comfortable. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | PEERJ INC | es_ES |
dc.rights | Atribución 3.0 España | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/ | * |
dc.subject | Kinesiology | es_ES |
dc.subject | Isokinetic | es_ES |
dc.subject | Shoulder | es_ES |
dc.subject | Strength | es_ES |
dc.subject | Velocity | es_ES |
dc.title | Reliability of a standing isokinetic shoulder rotators strength test using a functional electromechanical dynamometer: effects of velocity | es_ES |
dc.type | journal article | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | open access | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.7717/peerj.9951 | |