Effects of Chemical and Auditory Cues of Hoopoes (Upupa epops) in Repellence and Attraction of Blood-Feeding Flies
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor
Tomás, Gustavo; Zamora Muñoz, Carmen; Martín-Vivaldi Martínez, Manuel Lorenzo; Barón, M. Dolores; Ruiz Castellano, Cristina; Soler, Juan J.Editorial
Frontiers Media SA
Materia
Begging Ceratopogonidae Culicidae Ectoparasite repellent Enterococcus faecalis Host location mechanisms Simuliidae Uropygial gland
Date
2020-09-30Referencia bibliográfica
Tomás G, Zamora-Muñoz C, Martín-Vivaldi M, Barón MD, Ruiz-Castellano C and Soler JJ (2020) Effects of Chemical and Auditory Cues of Hoopoes (Upupa epops) in Repellence and Attraction of Blood-Feeding Flies. Front. Ecol. Evol. 8:579667 .[doi: 10.3389/fevo.2020.579667]
Sponsorship
Spanish Ministerio de Economia, Industria y Competitividad CGL2017-89063-P CGL2017-83103-P; Spanish GovernmentAbstract
Research on the mechanisms involved in host location by parasites is of paramount
importance and may aid in developing protective measures against them. This topic
attains far-reaching repercussions for human and animal welfare regarding parasites
transmitting vector-borne pathogens, such as blood-feeding flies. Very few studies have
evaluated the effect of bird-derived cues on attraction of vectors in field conditions.
We here explored the attraction of different groups of blood-feeding flies (mosquitoes,
blackflies and biting midges) to auditory cues produced by begging hoopoe (Upupa
epops) nestlings, and to three chemical cues derived from hoopoe nestlings or nests
(uropygial secretion, symbiotic bacteria isolated from the secretion, and nest material)
in the field. We deployed insect traps baited with the different stimuli at the beginning
and at the end of the hoopoe breeding-season in four different habitats. Abundance of
blood-feeding flies varied depending on habitat and sampling period. Begging auditory
cues of nestling hoopoes did not affect abundance of flies. However, chemical stimuli
affected abundance of mosquitoes, which were less abundant in traps baited with
bacteria or with nest material than in control traps. Abundance of biting midges in
traps also depended on the chemical stimulus but in interaction with sampling period
or habitat. Fewer biting midges were collected in traps baited with bacteria and with
secretion in the habitats where abundance of biting midges is higher. Our results suggest
that uropygial secretion of hoopoes, and symbiotic bacteria living in this secretion, may
repel blood-feeding flies from their nests.