Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorGalar, Mikel
dc.contributor.authorPeralta, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorTriguero, Isaac
dc.contributor.authorGarcía López, Salvador 
dc.contributor.authorBenítez Sánchez, José Manuel 
dc.contributor.authorHerrera Triguero, Francisco 
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-16T09:32:53Z
dc.date.available2020-12-16T09:32:53Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationGalar, M., Derrac, J., Peralta, D., Triguero, I., Paternain, D., Lopez-Molina, C., . . . Herrera, F. b. (2015). A survey of fingerprint classification part II: Experimental analysis and ensemble proposal. Knowledge-Based Systems, 81, 98-116. [doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.02.015]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10481/64944
dc.description.abstractIn the first part of this paper we reviewed the fingerprint classification literature from two different perspectives: the feature extraction and the classifier learning. Aiming at answering the question of which among the reviewed methods would perform better in a real implementation we end up in a discussion which showed the difficulty in answering this question. No previous comparison exists in the literature and comparisons among papers are done with different experimental frameworks. Moreover, the difficulty in implementing published methods was stated due to the lack of details in their description, parameters and the fact that no source code is shared. For this reason, in this paper we will go through a deep experimental study following the proposed double perspective. In order to do so, we have carefully implemented some of the most relevant feature extraction methods according to the explanations found in the corresponding papers and we have tested their performance with different classifiers, including those specific proposals made by the authors. Our aim is to develop an objective experimental study in a common framework, which has not been done before and which can serve as a baseline for future works on the topic. This way, we will not only test their quality, but their reusability by other researchers and will be able to indicate which proposals could be considered for future developments. Furthermore, we will show that combining different feature extraction models in an ensemble can lead to a superior performance, significantly increasing the results obtained by individual models.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipResearch Projects CAB(CDTI) TIN2011-28488 TIN2013-40765es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipSpanish Government FPU12/04902es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherELSEVIERes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectFingerprint classificationes_ES
dc.subjectFeature extractiones_ES
dc.subjectClassification es_ES
dc.subjectFingerprint recognitiones_ES
dc.subjectSVMes_ES
dc.subjectNeural networkses_ES
dc.subjectEnsemblees_ES
dc.subjectOrientation Mapes_ES
dc.subjectSingular Pointses_ES
dc.subjectExperimental evaluationes_ES
dc.titleA Survey of Fingerprint Classification Part II: Experimental Analysis and Ensemble Proposales_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.knosys.2015.02.015


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España