A global model–measurement evaluation of particle light scattering coefficients at elevated relative humidity
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemEditorial
Copernicus Gesellschaft MBH
Fecha
2020-09-04Referencia bibliográfica
Burgos, M. A., Andrews, E., Titos, G., Benedetti, A., Bian, H., Buchard, V., ... & Laakso, A. (2020). A global model–measurement evaluation of particle light scattering coefficients at elevated relative humidity. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20(17), 10231-10258. [https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10231-2020]
Patrocinador
United States Department of Energy (DOE) DE-SC0016541Resumen
The uptake of water by atmospheric aerosols has
a pronounced effect on particle light scattering properties,
which in turn are strongly dependent on the ambient relative
humidity (RH). Earth system models need to account
for the aerosol water uptake and its influence on light scattering
in order to properly capture the overall radiative effects
of aerosols. Here we present a comprehensive model–
measurement evaluation of the particle light scattering enhancement
factor f (RH), defined as the particle light scattering
coefficient at elevated RH (here set to 85 %) divided by its dry value. The comparison uses simulations from 10 Earth
system models and a global dataset of surface-based in situ
measurements. In general, we find a large diversity in the
magnitude of predicted f (RH) amongst the different models,
which can not be explained by the site types. Based on our
evaluation of sea salt scattering enhancement and simulated
organic mass fraction, there is a strong indication that differences
in the model parameterizations of hygroscopicity and
model chemistry are driving at least some of the observed
diversity in simulated f (RH). Additionally, a key point is that defining dry conditions is difficult from an observational
point of view and, depending on the aerosol, may influence
the measured f (RH). The definition of dry also impacts our
model evaluation, because several models exhibit significant
water uptake between RH D0% and 40 %. The multisite average
ratio between model outputs and measurements is 1.64
when RHD0% is assumed as the model dry RH and 1.16
when RHD40% is the model dry RH value. The overestimation
by the models is believed to originate from the hygroscopicity
parameterizations at the lower RH range which
may not implement all phenomena taking place (i.e., not fully
dried particles and hysteresis effects). This will be particularly
relevant when a location is dominated by a deliquescent
aerosol such as sea salt. Our results emphasize the need
to consider the measurement conditions in such comparisons
and recognize that measurements referred to as dry may not
be dry in model terms. Recommendations for future model–
measurement evaluation and model improvements are provided.