Salvage logging effects on regulating ecosystem services and fuel loads
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Leverkus, Alexandro B.; Gustafsson, Lena; Lindenmayer, David B.; Castro Gutiérrez, Jorge; Rey Benayas, José María; Ranius, Thomas; Thorn, SimonEditorial
Wiley; Ecological Society of America
Fecha
2020-06-08Referencia bibliográfica
Leverkus, Alexandro B. et. al. Salvage logging effects on regulating ecosystem services and fuel loads. Front Ecol Environ 2020; 18(7):391–400, [doi:10.1002/fee.2219]
Patrocinador
Project AS2013/MAE-2719 “REMEDINAL-3” from the Government of MadridResumen
Salvage logging, or logging after natural disturbances such as wildfires, insect outbreaks, and windstorms, is carried out to recover
some of a forest’s natural and/or economic capital. However, trade-offs
between management objectives and a lack of consensus
on the ecological consequences of salvage logging impair science-based
decision making on the management of forests after natural
disturbances. We conducted a global meta-analysis
of the impacts of salvage logging on regulating ecosystem services and on
fuel loads, as a frequent post-disturbance
objective is preventing subsequent wildfires that could be fueled by the accumulation of
dead trunks and branches. Salvage logging affected ecosystem services in a moderately negative way, regardless of disturbance type
and severity, time elapsed since salvage logging, intensity of salvage logging, and the group of regulating ecosystem services being
considered. However, prolonging the time between natural disturbance and salvage logging mitigated negative effects on regulating
ecosystem services. Salvage logging had no overall effect on surface fuels; rather, different fuel types responded differently
depending on the time elapsed since salvage logging. Delaying salvage logging by ~2–4 years may reduce negative ecological
impacts without affecting surface fuel loads.