Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCuenca Fernández, Francisco 
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Teba, Ana
dc.contributor.authorLópez Contreras, Gracia 
dc.contributor.authorArellano Colomina, Raúl 
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-23T09:23:12Z
dc.date.available2020-06-23T09:23:12Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationCuenca-Fernández, F., Ruiz-Teba, A., López-Contreras, G., & Arellano, R. (2018). Effects of 2 types of activation protocols based on postactivation potentiation on 50-m freestyle performance. Journal of strength and conditioning research.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10481/62638
dc.description.abstractPostactivation potentiation (PAP) is a phenomenon which improves muscle contractility, strength and speed in sporting performances through previously applied maximal or submaximal loads on the muscle system. This study aimed to assess the effects of two types of activation protocols based on PAP, on sprint swimming performance. A repeated-measures design was used to compare three different scenarios prior to a 50-m race. First, all of the participants performed a standard warm-up (SWU), consisting of a 400-m swim followed by dynamic stretching. This protocol acted as the control. Subsequently, the swimmers were randomly assigned into two groups: the swimmers in the first group performed the SWU followed by a PAP one-repetition warm-up (RMWU), consisting of three “lunge” and three “arm stroke” repetitions, both at 85% of the one-repetition maximum. The swimmers in the second group performed the SWU followed by a PAP eccentric flywheel warm-up (EWU), consisting of one set of four repetitions of exercises of both the lower and upper limbs on an adapted eccentric flywheel at the maximal voluntary contraction. The time required for the swimmers to swim 5 and 10 m was shorter with the PAP protocols. The swimming velocity of the swimmers who underwent the EWU and RMWU protocols were faster at 5 and 10 m. The best total swimming time was not influenced by any of the protocols. When isolating swimming (excluding start performance and turn), best time was achieved with the SWU and RMWU compared with EWU (SWU: 20.86 ± 0.95 s; EWU: 21.25 ± 1.12 s; RMWU: 20.97 ± 1.22 s). In conclusion, a warm up based on PAP protocols might exert an influence on performance in the first meters of a 50-m race. Nevertheless, other factors, such as fatigue, could modify swimming patterns and yield results contradictory to those of the desired task.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipCTS-527: Actividad física y deportiva en el medio acuáticoes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherLippicontt Williams & Wilkinses_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectFlywheeles_ES
dc.subjectWarm-upes_ES
dc.subjectSprint Swimminges_ES
dc.subjectPAPes_ES
dc.titleEffects of two types of activation protocols based on postactivation potentiation on 50-meter freestyle performancees_ES
dc.title.alternativePostactivation potentiation on 50-meter freestylees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1519/jsc.0000000000002698
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersiones_ES


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España