Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorTriviño Ibáñez, Eva María
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Vañó, Raquel
dc.contributor.authorSopena Novales, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorRomero Fábrega, Juan Carlos
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Fernández, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorCarnero Pardo, Cristóbal
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Lozano, María Dolores
dc.contributor.authorGómez Río, Manuel 
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-14T11:28:59Z
dc.date.available2020-05-14T11:28:59Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationTriviño-Ibáñez, E. M., Sánchez-Vañó, R., Sopena-Novales, P., Romero-Fábrega, J. C., Rodríguez-Fernández, A., Pardo, C. C., ... & Gómez-Río, M. (2019). Impact of amyloid-PET in daily clinical management of patients with cognitive impairment fulfilling appropriate use criteria. Medicine, 98(29).es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10481/62085
dc.description.abstractTo evaluate the use of amyloid-positron emission tomography (PET) in routine clinical practice, in a selected population with cognitive impairment that meets appropriate use criteria (AUC). A multicenter, observational, prospective case-series study of 211patients from 2 level-3 hospitals who fulfilled clinical AUC for amyloid-PET scan in a naturalistic setting. Certainty degree was evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale: 0 (very low probability); 1 (low probability); 2 (intermediate probability); 3 (high probability); and 4 (practically sure), before and after amyloid PET. The treatment plan was considered as cognition-specific or noncognition-specific. Amyloid-PET was positive in 118 patients (55.9%) and negative in 93 patients (44.1%). Diagnostic prescan confidence according amyloid-PET results showed that in both, negative and positive-PET subgroup, the most frequent category was intermediate probability (45.7% and 55.1%, respectively). After the amyloid-PET, the diagnostic confidence showed a very different distribution, that was, in the negative-PET group the most frequent categories are very unlikely (70.7%) and unlikely (29.3%), while in the positive- PET group were very probable (57.6%) and practically sure (39%). Only in 14/211 patients (6.6%) the result of the amyloid-PET did not influence the diagnostic confidence, while in 194 patients (93.4%), the diagnostic confidence improved significantly after amyloid- PET results. The therapeutic intention was modified in 93 patients (44.1%). Specific treatment for Alzheimer disease was started, before amyloid-PET, in 80 patients (37.9%). This naturalistic study provides evidence that the implementation of amyloid-PET is associated with a significant improvement in diagnostic confidence and has a high impact on the therapeutic management of patients with mild cognitive impairment fulfilled clinical AUC.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Health, Inces_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectAlzheimer’s diseasees_ES
dc.subjectAppropriate use criteriaes_ES
dc.subjectAmyloid PETes_ES
dc.subjectMild cognitive impairmentes_ES
dc.subjectFlorbetaben PETes_ES
dc.titleImpact of amyloid-PET in daily clinical management of patients with cognitive impairment fulfilling appropriate use criteriaes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/MD.0000000000016509


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España