Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMartín Aguacil, José
dc.contributor.authorArroyo Morales, Manuel 
dc.contributor.authorMartín Gómez, José Luis
dc.contributor.authorLozano Lozano, Mario 
dc.contributor.authorGaliano Castillo, Noelia 
dc.contributor.authorCantarero Villanueva, Irene 
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-13T11:57:28Z
dc.date.available2020-05-13T11:57:28Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-12
dc.identifier.citationMartin-Alguacil, J. L., Arroyo-Morales, M., Martin-Gómez, J. L., Lozano-Lozano, M., Galiano-Castillo, N., & Cantarero-Villanueva, I. (2019). Comparison of knee sonography and pressure pain threshold after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts in soccer players. Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 53(4), 260-265.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10481/62037
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to compare the pressure pain threshold and muscle architecture after an anatomic single bundle reconstruction with quadriceps tendon and hamstring tendon autografts of the anterior cruciate ligament in competitive soccer players. We hypothesized that both procedures will obtain similar outcomes. Methods: Fifty-one participants were enrolled in this secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial and were categorised into two groups: quadriceps tendon (QT) group (23 men and 3 women; mean age 18.7 ± 3.6; BMI 23.0 ± 2.2) or hamstring tendon (HT) group (16 men and 9 women; mean age 19.2 ± 3.6 BMI 23.5 ± 3.5). Both groups followed the same rehabilitation staged protocol. Pressure pain threshold (PPT), as a measure of perceived pain, was obtained in several points of quadriceps and hamstring muscles. Ultrasound imaging measurements were obtained in quadriceps tendon and knee cartilage thickness. Four measurements were taken in this study: baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Results: The analysis of PPT did not find significant differences in both groups x interaction time in the points evaluated: epicondyle (QT = 421.1 ± 184.1 vs HT = 384.7 ± 154.1 kPa), vastus lateralis (QT = 576.2 ± 221.3 vs HT = 560.1 ± 167.7 kPa), vastus medialis (QT = 544.7 ± 198.8 vs HT = 541.1.1 ± 181.77 kPa), patellar tendon (QT = 626.3 ± 221.1 vs HT = 665.0 ± 205.5 kPa), QT (QT = 651.1 ± 276.9 vs HT = 660.0 ± 195.2 kPa). (QT = 667.8 ± 284.7 vs HT = 648.2 ± 193.4 kPa) injured knee (all P > 0.05). The results of ultrasound imaging did not show significant differences in both groups interaction time in the thickness of the QT (QT = 9.9 ± 2.4 vs HT = 9.4 ± 1.7 kPa) and patellar cartilage (QT = 3.2 ± 0.6 vs HT = 3.2 ± 0.4 kPa) (P > 0.05). Conclusion: A QT autograft produces similar results to a HT autograft in ACL reconstructions in terms of pressure pain threshold and ultrasound muscle architecture during the 1-year follow-up. Level of Evidence: Level I, Therapeutic Study.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.es_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectAnterior cruciate ligamentes_ES
dc.subjectQuadricepses_ES
dc.subjectHamstringses_ES
dc.subjectPressure pain thresholdes_ES
dc.subjectUltrasoundes_ES
dc.titleComparison of knee sonography and pressure pain threshold after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts in soccer playerses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aott.2019.04.012


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España