Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorOkan Gil, Yasmina
dc.contributor.authorPetrova, Dafina 
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Samuel G.
dc.contributor.authorLesic, Vedran
dc.contributor.authorBruine de Bruin, Wändi
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-13T11:46:46Z
dc.date.available2020-04-13T11:46:46Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationOkan, Y., Petrova, D., Smith, S. G., Lesic, V., & Bruine de Bruin, W. (2019). How Do Women Interpret the NHS Information Leaflet about Cervical Cancer Screening?. Medical Decision Making, 39(7), 738-754.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10481/61120
dc.description.abstractBackground. Organized screening programs often rely on written materials to inform the public. In the United Kingdom, women invited for cervical cancer screening receive a leaflet from the National Health Service (NHS) to support screening decisions. However, information about screening may be too complex for people to understand, potentially hindering informed decision making. Objectives. We aimed to identify women’s difficulties in interpreting the leaflet used in England and negative and positive responses to the leaflet. Methods. We used a sequential mixedmethods design involving 2 steps: cognitive think-aloud interviews (n = 20), followed by an England-wide survey (n = 602). Data were collected between June 2017 and December 2018, and participants included women aged 25 to 64 y with varying sociodemographics. Results. Interview results revealed misunderstandings concerning screening results, benefits, and additional tests and treatment, although participants tended to react positively to numerical information. Participants were often unfamiliar with the potential harms associated with screening (i.e., screening risks), key aspects of human papillomavirus, and complex terms (e.g., dyskaryosis). Survey results indicated that interpretation difficulties were common (M correct items = 12.5 of 23). Lower understanding was associated with lower educational level (b’s .0.15, P’s \0.001), lower numeracy scores (b = 0.36, P \ 0.001), and nonwhite ethnicity (b = 0.10, P = 0.007). The leaflet was evaluated positively overall. Conclusions. Despite previous user testing of the leaflet, key information may be too complex for some recipients. As a consequence, they may struggle to make informed decisions about screening participation based on the information provided. We discuss implications for the improvement of communications about screening and decision support.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSage Publications, Inc.es_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectCancer screeninges_ES
dc.subjectCervical canceres_ES
dc.subjectInformed decision makinges_ES
dc.subjectPatient informationes_ES
dc.subjectRisk communication es_ES
dc.titleHow Do Women Interpret the NHS Information Leaflet about Cervical Cancer Screening?es_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0272989X19873647


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 3.0 España
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución 3.0 España