dc.contributor.author | Cejudo, Ana B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Gómez Ariza, Carlos Javier | |
dc.contributor.author | Bajo Molina, María Teresa | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-27T12:24:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-27T12:24:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-01-09 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Cejudo AB, Gómez-Ariza CJ and Bajo MT (2019) The Cost of Prospective Memory in Children: The Role of Cue Focality. Front. Psychol. 9:2738. | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10481/59170 | |
dc.description.abstract | Prospective memory (PM) is an essential ability in daily life, since it involves remembering
to perform an intention. While PM largely develops during childhood and adolescence,
its underlying mechanisms are still poorly understood. In general, age differences in PM
have been found with tasks in which the prospective cues are not part of the ongoing
activity (non-focal PM tasks). In the present study, we evaluated the cognitive cost
produced by a PM task over the ongoing activity by comparing the performance of
a single-task condition with that of an ongoing activity condition involving a prospective
intention. Specifically, to determine the impact of cue focality on performance as a
function of age, we tested two groups of children (6 and 11 years old) in three
experimental conditions: single, focal and non-focal prospective cues. In the singletask
condition, children were only asked to perform the ongoing task (to categorize
images as animal or non-animal). In the focal condition, in addition to performing the
ongoing activity, participants were asked to press different keys whenever the image
appearing on the screen was a kite or a ball. In the non-focal condition, children were
to press the keys if the color of the frame of the screen changed to magenta or gray.
Although reaction times were greater for the non-focal conditions in both age groups,
the results showed worse performance on the ongoing activity for both the focal and
the non-focal conditions (relative to the single-task condition) in the younger children.
This difference was less pronounced in older children so that response times for focal
and non-focal cues differed from the single condition, but the difference in performance
between focal and single task conditions was not reliable. These findings, which are
partly in line with the dual process framework (McDaniel et al., 2015), suggest that
while non-focal prospective cues compromise attentional control in younger and older
children, focal cues seem to rely on less effortful processes in older children. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | The current research was completed thanks to financial aid
provided by the doctoral research grant FPU13/03768 to AC
and grants from the Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad
Fondos Feder to MB (PSI2015-65502-C2-1-P) and CG-A
(PSI2015-65502-C2-2-P). | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Frontiers Media | es_ES |
dc.rights | Atribución 3.0 España | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/ | * |
dc.subject | Prospective memory | es_ES |
dc.subject | Cue focality | es_ES |
dc.subject | Cognitive cost | es_ES |
dc.subject | Children | es_ES |
dc.subject | Development | es_ES |
dc.title | The Cost of Prospective Memory in Children: The Role of Cue Focality | es_ES |
dc.type | journal article | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | open access | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02738 | |