Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorRamírez Vélez, Robinson
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Jiménez, Emilio 
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt Río Valle, Jacqueline 
dc.contributor.authorCorrea Rodríguez, María 
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-24T11:24:17Z
dc.date.available2020-01-24T11:24:17Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-24
dc.identifier.citationRamírez-Vélez, R., Pérez-Sousa, M. Á., Izquierdo, M., Cano-Gutierrez, C. A., González-Jiménez, E., Schmidt-RioValle, J., ... & Correa-Rodríguez, M. (2019). Validation of Surrogate Anthropometric Indices in Older Adults: What Is the Best Indicator of High Cardiometabolic Risk Factor Clustering?. Nutrients, 11(8), 1701.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10481/59126
dc.description.abstractThe present study evaluated the ability of five obesity-related parameters, including a body shape index (ABSI), conicity index (CI), body roundness index (BRI), body mass index (BMI), and waist-to-height ratio (WtHR) for predicting increased cardiometabolic risk in a population of elderly Colombians. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 1502 participants (60.3% women, mean age 70 7.6 years) and subjects’ weight, height, waist circumference, serum lipid indices, blood pressure, and fasting plasma glucose were measured. A cardiometabolic risk index (CMRI) was calculated using the participants’ systolic and diastolic blood pressure, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein and fasting glucose levels, and waist circumference. Following the International Diabetes Federation definition, metabolic syndrome was defined as having three or more metabolic abnormalities. All surrogate anthropometric indices correlated significantly with CMRI (p < 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of how well the anthropometric indices identified high cardiometabolic risk showed that WtHR and BRI were the most accurate indices. The best WtHR and BRI cut-off points in men were 0.56 (area under curve, AUC 0.77) and 4.71 (AUC 0.77), respectively. For women, the WtHR and BRI cut-off points were 0.63 (AUC 0.77) and 6.20 (AUC 0.77), respectively. In conclusion, BRI and WtHR have a moderate discriminating power for detecting high cardiometabolic risk in older Colombian adults, supporting the idea that both anthropometric indices are useful screening tools for use in the elderly.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study is part of a larger project that has been funded by the Colciencias y Ministerio de Salud y la Protección Social de Colombia (The SABE Study ID 2013, no. 764).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectAnthropometric indiceses_ES
dc.subjectDiagnosis criteriaes_ES
dc.subjectMetabolic syndromees_ES
dc.subjectCardiometabolic riskes_ES
dc.subjectElderlyes_ES
dc.titleValidation of Surrogate Anthropometric Indices in Older Adults: What Is the Best Indicator of High Cardiometabolic Risk Factor Clustering?es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/nu11081701


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

[PDF]
[PDF]

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Atribución 3.0 España
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Atribución 3.0 España