Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorAcosta Rangel, Aurora
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Polo, Manuel 
dc.contributor.authorRivera Utrilla, José 
dc.contributor.authorRozalen, María
dc.contributor.authorPolo, A. M. S.
dc.contributor.authorMota Ávila, Antonio José 
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-08T13:52:27Z
dc.date.available2020-01-08T13:52:27Z
dc.date.issued2019-11-07
dc.identifier.citationAcosta-Rangel, A., Sánchez-Polo, M., Rozalen, M., Rivera-Utrilla, J., Polo, A. M. S., & Mota, A. J. (2019). Comparative Study of the Oxidative Degradation of Different 4-Aminobenzene Sulfonamides in Aqueous Solution by Sulfite Activation in the Presence of Fe (0), Fe (II), Fe (III) Or Fe (VI). Water, 11(11), 2332.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10481/58541
dc.description.abstractThis study is focused on advanced oxidation technologies (AOTs) using the combined effect of Fe(0–VI)/sulfite systems, that produce mainly SO4 radicals, to remove di erent 4-aminobenzene sulfonamides (SAs), namely sulfamethazine, sulfadiazine, sulfamethizole, from aqueous solutions. Results obtained showed that neither sulfite nor iron alone is able to degrade SAs; however, the combined effect depends on the oxidation state of iron species whose effectiveness to activate sulfite to promote the degradation of SAs increased following this order: Fe(III) < Fe(II) < Fe(0) < Fe(VI). Using Fe(VI)/sulfite, the complete removal of SAs was obtained in 5 min largely surpassing the effectiveness of the other three systems. The sulfonamides’ removal percentage was markedly influenced by sulfite concentration and dissolved oxygen, which improved the generation of oxidant radicals. Response surface methodology was applied, and a quadratic polynomial model was obtained, which allowed us to determine the percentage of SAs degradation as a function of both the iron species and sulfite concentrations. The study of the influence of the water matrix on these AOTs revealed an inhibition of SAs’ removal percentage when using ground water. This is probably due to the presence of different anions, such as HCO3 -, Cl-, and SO4 2- in relatively high concentrations. According to the byproducts identified, the proposed degradation pathways include hydroxylation, SO2 extrusion, and different bond-cleavage processes. Cytotoxicity of degradation byproducts, using MTS assay with HEK 293 and J774 cell lines for the first time, did not show an inhibition in cell proliferation, sustaining the safety of the process.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded by both Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain, grant number CTQ2016-80978-C2-1-R, and CONACyT (Mexico), grant number 407494.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectAdvanced oxidation technologieses_ES
dc.subjectSulfitees_ES
dc.subjectIron es_ES
dc.subjectWater contaminantses_ES
dc.subjectSulfonamideses_ES
dc.subjectCytotoxicityes_ES
dc.titleComparative Study of the Oxidative Degradation of Different 4-Aminobenzene Sulfonamides in Aqueous Solution by Sulfite Activation in the Presence of Fe(0), Fe(II), Fe(III) or Fe(VI)es_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/w11112332


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 3.0 España
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución 3.0 España