Multifactor implicit measures to assess enterprising personality dimensions
Metadatos
Afficher la notice complèteAuteur
Martínez Loredo, Victor; Cuesta, Marcelino; Lozano Fernández, Luis Manuel; Pedrosa, Ignacio; Muñiz, JoseEditorial
Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos del Principado de Asturias
Materia
Implicit Association Test Entrepreneurship Personality Assessment
Date
2018Referencia bibliográfica
Martínez-Loredo, V., Cuesta, M., Pedrosa, I., & Muñiz, J. (2018). Multifactor implicit measures to assess enterprising personality dimensions. Psicothema, 30(4).
Patrocinador
The present study was funded by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Refs: PSI2014-56114-P and PSI2017-85724-P) and a predoctoral grant (Ref: BES- 2015-073327). Both funding sources played no role in the study design, data collection, analysis or interpretation of the resultsRésumé
Background: Several implicit measures have been proposed to overcome
limitations of self-reports. The present study aimed to develop a new
implicit association test (MFT-IAT) to assess enterprising-related traits,
exploring its reliability and validity evidence. Method: A total of
1,142 individuals (Mean age 42.36 years, SD = 13.17) from the general
population were assessed. Participants were asked about sociodemographic
data, employment status, and personality traits using the Battery for the
Assessment of the Enterprising Personality (BEPE). They completed an
MFT-IAT designed to assess the BEPE’s traits (achievement motivation,
autonomy, innovativeness, self-effi cacy, locus of control, optimism, stress
tolerance and risk taking). Reliability was estimated using Cronbach’s alpha.
Exploratory Factor Analyses (EFAs) were performed to assess the internal
structure of the MFT-IAT. Correlations and a Multiple Analysis of Variance
were used to estimate validity evidence based on the relationship towith
participants’ employment status. Results: EFAs provided validity evidence
for all dimensions with high internal consistency (a = .92-.93). Correlations
between implicit and explicit measures were non-signifi cant. Non- implicit
measures yielded signifi cant differences between employment statuses.
Discussion: This is a pioneering study in this fi eld and more research is
needed to improve the feasibility and practicality of implicit measures in
applied assessment settings.