Energy expenditure differences across lying, sitting, and standing positions in young healthy adults
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor
Amaro Gahete, Francisco José; Sánchez-Delgado, Guillermo; Alcántara, Juan; Martínez Téllez, Borja Manuel; Acosta Manzano, Francisco Miguel; Merchán Ramírez, Elisa; Löf, Marie; Labayen, Idoia; Ruiz Ruiz, JonatanEditorial
PLOS
Date
2019-06-12Referencia bibliográfica
Amaro-Gahete FJ, Sanchez-Delgado G, Alcantara JMA, Martinez-Tellez B, Acosta FM, Merchan-Ramirez E, et al. (2019) Energy expenditure differences across lying, sitting, and standing positions in young healthy adults. PLoS ONE 14(6): e0217029
Sponsorship
This work was supported by: JRR: Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Fondo de Investigacio´n Sanitaria del Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI13/01393) and Retos de la Sociedad (DEP2016-79512-R); JRR: Fondos Estructurales de la Unio´n Europea (FEDER); FAG, GSD, JMA: Spanish Ministry of Education (FPU 13/04365, FPU14/04172, and FPU15/04059); JRR: Fundacio´n Iberoamericana de Nutricio´n (FINUT); JRR: Redes tema´ticas de investigacio´n cooperativa RETIC (Red SAMID RD16/0022); JRR: AstraZeneca HealthCare Foundation; JRR: University of Granada, Plan Propio de Investigacio´n 2016, Excellence actions: Units of Excellence, Unit of Excellence on Exercise and Health (UCEES)Abstract
The time spent in sedentary behaviour represents an important public health burden. To
reduce sedentary time in the general population, the simplest, most effective, and most
accessible method is to decrease lying and sitting time. We aimed to compare differences
on energy expenditure (EE) across lying, sitting, and standing positions; and to analyse the
associations between the change on EE of changing from one position to another and
anthropometric and body composition parameters in young healthy adults. A total of 55
(69% women) young healthy adults aged 21.7 ± 2.2 participated in the study. We measured
EE by indirect calorimetry across lying, sitting, and standing positions following the standard
procedures. The EE was significantly higher in standing than in both lying and sitting positions
(mean difference: 0.121±0.292 and 0.125±0.241 kcal/min, respectively; all P<0.001),
and no differences were observed between lying and sitting positions (P = 1.000). There
was a negative association between the EE differences in sitting vs. standing position and
lean body mass (P = 0.048), yet no associations between EE differences with the rest of the
anthropometric and body composition parameters were observed in each position pair studied
(all P>0.321). Our findings support the fact that increasing the time spent standing could
be a simple strategy to slightly increase EE. Therefore, our results have important clinical
implications including a better monitoring, characterizing, and promoting countermeasures
to sedentariness through low-level physical activities.