Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCabrerizo, F.J. 
dc.contributor.authorMoreno, J. M.
dc.contributor.authorPérez, I. J.
dc.contributor.authorHerrera Viedma, Enrique 
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-19T06:14:14Z
dc.date.available2010-10-19T06:14:14Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00500-009-0453-x
dc.identifier.citationF.J. Cabrerizo, J.M. Moreno, I.J. Pérez, E. Herrera-Viedma. Analyzing consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making: advantages and drawbacks. Soft Computing 14:5 (2010) 451-463.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10481/5674
dc.description.abstractTwo processes are necessary to solve group decision making problems: a consensus process and a selection process. The consensus process is necessary to obtain a nal solution with a certain level of agreement between the experts while the selection process is necessary to obtain such a nal solution. Clearly, it is preferable that the set of experts reach a high degree of consensus before applying the selection process. In order to measure the degree of consensus, different approaches have been proposed. For example, we can use hard consensus measures, which vary between 0 (no consensus or partial consensus) and 1 (full consensus), or soft consensus measures, which assess the consensus degree in a more exible way. The aim of this paper is to analyze the different consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making problems and discuss their advantages and drawbacks. Additionally, we study the future trends.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
dc.subjectGroup decision makingen
dc.subjectConsensus processen
dc.subjectSoft consensus measuresen
dc.subjectFuture trendsen
dc.titleAnalyzing consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making: advantages and drawbacksen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License