• English 
    • español
    • English
    • français
  • FacebookPinterestTwitter
  • español
  • English
  • français
View Item 
  •   DIGIBUG Home
  • 5.-Documentos Institucionales
  • Unidad de Evaluación de la Actividad Científica
  • View Item
  •   DIGIBUG Home
  • 5.-Documentos Institucionales
  • Unidad de Evaluación de la Actividad Científica
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The insoluble problems of books: What does Altmetric.com have to offer?

[PDF] 1809.10128.pdf (1.199Mb)
Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10481/53005
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1437020
Exportar
RISRefworksMendeleyBibtex
Estadísticas
View Usage Statistics
Metadata
Show full item record
Author
Torres Salinas, Daniel; Gorraiz, Juan; Robinson García, Nicolás
Materia
Altmetrics
 
Altmetric.com
 
Books
 
Bibliometrics
 
Databases
 
Date
2018-09-27
Abstract
Purpose: Analyze the capabilities, functionalities and appropriateness of Altmetric.com as a data source for the bibliometric analysis of books in comparison to PlumX. Methodology: We perform an exploratory analysis on the metrics the Altmetric Explorer for Institutions platform offers for books. We use two distinct datasets of books. On the one hand, we analyze the Book Collection included in Altmetric.com. On the other, we use Clarivate’s Master Book List, to analyze Altmetric.com’s capabilities to download and merge data with external databases. Finally, we compare our findings with those obtained in a previous study performed in PlumX. Findings: Altmetric.com combines and orderly tracks a set of data sources combined by DOI identifiers to retrieve metadata from books, being Google Books its main provider. It also retrieves information from commercial publishers and from some Open Access initiatives, including those led by university libraries such as Harvard Library. We find issues with linkages between records and mentions or ISBN discrepancies. Furthermore, we find that automatic bots affect greatly Wikipedia mentions to books. Our comparison with PlumX suggests that none of these tools provide a complete picture of the social attention generated by books and are rather complementary than comparable tools. Practical implications: This study targets different audiences which can benefit from our findings. First, bibliometricians and researchers who seek for alternative sources to develop bibliometric analyses of books, with a special focus on the Social Sciences and Humanities fields. Second, librarians and research managers who are the main clients to which these tools are directed. Third, Altmetric.com itself as well as other altmetric providers who might get a better understanding of the limitations users encounter and improve this promising tool. Originality/value: This is the first study to analyze Altmetric.com’s functionalities and capabilities for providing metric data for books and to compare results from this platform, with those obtained via PlumX
Collections
  • Unidad de Evaluación de la Actividad Científica

My Account

LoginRegister

Browse

All of DIGIBUGCommunities and CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectFinanciaciónAuthor profilesThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectFinanciación

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Servicios

Pasos para autoarchivoAyudaLicencias Creative CommonsSHERPA/RoMEODulcinea Biblioteca UniversitariaNos puedes encontrar a través deCondiciones legales

Contact Us | Send Feedback