Estudio del proceso de toma de decisiones y la influencia del feedback en situaciones de riesgo en conducción
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor
Torres Cobo, Miguel ÁngelEditorial
Universidad de Granada
Departamento
Universidad de Granada.; Programa Oficial de Doctorado en Psicología; Mind, Braind and Behivior Research Center (CIMCYC)Materia
Psicología Toma de decisiones Conducción Feedback Conducción
Materia UDC
159.9 159.92 6100 6103
Date
2018Fecha lectura
2018-04-27Referencia bibliográfica
Torres Cobo, M. A. Estudio del proceso de toma de decisiones y la influencia del feedback en situaciones de riesgo en conducción. Granada: Universidad de Granada, 2018. [http://hdl.handle.net/10481/51129]
Sponsorship
Tesis Univ. Granada.; Programa Oficial de Doctorado en PsicologíaAbstract
Every year, around 1.25 millions of people in the world die because of traffic
accidents. Almost 50% of the deaths among individuals between 15 and 44 years old
are caused by traffic accidents (World Health Organization, 2015). This issue needs
further research on the causes and the possible solutions. There are multiple factors
related to road accidents, but according to most investigation in this matter the human
clearly leads the table as the main cause (Wierwille et al., 2002). The conceptual framework of this thesis focused on the study of cognitive
processing in decision-making in risky driving situations. The thesis consists of three
broad foci: a) The first experimental block (chapter 2) focuses on the study of the effect of
non-contingent feedback in risky behavior using a driving context. From the literature,
we analyze the characteristics of different types of risky behaviors compared to driving. b) The second experimental block (chapter 3) differentiates between urgent
and evaluative behaviors (Megías, Maldonado, Cándido & Catena, 2011b). The first
one includes time pressure, depends on stimulus and has possible negative
consequences. It is based on System 1 or automatic system, which uses previous
experience and emotional characteristics of the situation. c) The third experimental block (chapter 4) tries to explain the effects of
response feedback on risk behavior and the neural and cognitive mechanisms involved,
as a function of the feedback contingency. We observed that contingent feedback,
compared with non-contingent one, promoted changes in the response bias towards
safer decisions. Taking together, this thesis studies the role of feedback in decision making
process in risky behavior using a driving context. This information can be useful to
design programs intended to improve road safety.