Clinical Application of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Novel Supportive Therapies for Oral Bone Regeneration
MetadatosMostrar el registro completo del ítem
AutorPadial Molina, Miguel; O'Valle Ravassa, Francisco Javier; Lanis, Alejandro; Mesa Aguado, Francisco Luis; Dohan Ehrenfest, David M.; Wang, Hom-Lay; Galindo Moreno, Pablo Antonio
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Platelet-rich fibrinPeriodontal-ligament fibroblastSimultaneous implant placementSinus floor augmentationNecrosis factor alphaMaxillary sinusAutogenous bone
Padial-Molina, M.; et al. Clinical Application of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Novel Supportive Therapies for Oral Bone Regeneration. BioMed Research International, 2015: 341327 (2015). [http://hdl.handle.net/10481/36632]
PatrocinadorThe authors of this paper were partially supported by the Talentia Scholarship Program (Junta de Andalucía, Spain) (MPM), the International Team for Implantology through the ITI Scholarship Program (AL), and the Research Groups #CTS-138 and #CTS-583 (Junta de Andalucía, Spain) (All).
Bone regeneration is often needed prior to dental implant treatment due to the lack of adequate quantity and quality of the bone after infectious diseases, trauma, tumor, or congenital conditions. In these situations, cell transplantation technologies may help to overcome the limitations of autografts, xenografts, allografts, and alloplastic materials. A database search was conducted to include human clinical trials (randomized or controlled) and case reports/series describing the clinical use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the oral cavity for bone regeneration only specifically excluding periodontal regeneration. Additionally, novel advances in related technologies are also described. 190 records were identified. 51 articles were selected for full-text assessment, and only 28 met the inclusion criteria: 9 case series, 10 case reports, and 9 randomized controlled clinical trials. Collectively, they evaluate the use of MSCs in a total of 290 patients in 342 interventions. The current published literature is very diverse in methodology and measurement of outcomes. Moreover, the clinical significance is limited. Therefore, the use of these techniques should be further studied in more challenging clinical scenarios with well-designed and standardized RCTs, potentially in combination with new scaffolding techniques and bioactive molecules to improve the final outcomes.