dc.contributor.author | Marefat, Hamideh | |
dc.contributor.author | Ghahari, Shima | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-05-21T11:24:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-05-21T11:24:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Marefat, H.; Ghahari, S. (Incorporating) Adjunct displays: a step toward facilitation of reading comprehension. Porta Linguarum, 11: 179-188 (2009). [http://hdl.handle.net/10481/31846] | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 1697-7467 | |
dc.identifier.other | D.L.: GR 43-2004 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10481/31846 | |
dc.description.abstract | Two types of adjunct displays, graphic organizer and outline, were compared
with text display to determine which one facilitates text comprehension by L2 learners.
The results indicated the superiority of adjunct displays. However, no difference was
observed between graphic organizers and outlines. Also it was found that low proficiency
learners benefited from adjunct displays more than high proficiency ones. The results
support the pedagogical potential of adjunct displays as text facilitators. The findings
are discussed within the framework of the theories behind adjunct display effect. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Universidad de Granada | es_ES |
dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License | es_ES |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ | es_ES |
dc.subject | Adjunct display effect | es_ES |
dc.subject | Graphic organizer | es_ES |
dc.subject | Outline | es_ES |
dc.subject | Reading comprehension | es_ES |
dc.subject | Expository texts | es_ES |
dc.title | (Incorporating) Adjunct displays: a step toward facilitation of reading comprehension | es_ES |
dc.type | journal article | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | open access | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.30827/Digibug.31846 | |