• français 
    • español
    • English
    • français
  • FacebookPinterestTwitter
  • español
  • English
  • français
Voir le document 
  •   Accueil de DIGIBUG
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Estomatología
  • DE - Artículos
  • Voir le document
  •   Accueil de DIGIBUG
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Estomatología
  • DE - Artículos
  • Voir le document
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Bond strength to root dentin and fluid filtration test of AH Plus/gutta-percha, EndoREZ and RealSeal systems

[PDF] Mahdi_RootDentin.pdf (1.725Mo)
Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10481/29882
ISSN: 1678-7757
Exportar
RISRefworksMendeleyBibtex
Estadísticas
Statistiques d'usage de visualisation
Metadatos
Afficher la notice complète
Auteur
Mahdi, Alaa Abdul; Bolaños Carmona, María Victoria; González López, Santiago
Editorial
Universidade de Sao Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
Materia
Resin cements
 
Root canal illing material
 
Compressive strength
 
Leakage
 
Date
2013
Referencia bibliográfica
Mahdi, A.A.; Bolaños Carmona, V.; González López, S. Bond strength to root dentin and fluid filtration test of AH Plus/gutta-percha, EndoREZ and RealSeal systems. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 21(4): 369-375 (2013). [http://hdl.handle.net/10481/29882]
Patrocinador
This investigation was supported by Research Grant no. CGL2011-25906.
Résumé
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the bond strength and seal ability produced by AH Plus/gutta-percha, EndoREZ and RealSeal systems to root canal dentin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty extracted single-root human teeth, instrumented manually to size 40, were divided into three groups (n=20) according to the sealer used; G1: AH Plus, G2: EndoREZ, and G3: RealSeal sealers. After filling using the lateral condensation technique, each sealer group was randomly divided into two subgroups according to the tests applied (n=10 for µPush-out test and n=10 for fluid filtration test). A fluid filtration method was used for quantitative evaluation of apical leakage. Four 1-mm-thick slices (cervical and medium level) were obtained from each root sample and a µPush-out test was performed. Failure modes were examined under microscopy at 40x, and a one-way ANOVA was applied to analyze the permeability. Non-parametrical statistics for related (Friedman's and Wilcoxon's rank tests) or unrelated samples (Kruskal-Wallis' and Mann-Whitney's tests) allowed for comparisons of µPush-out strength values among materials at the different levels. Statistical significance was accepted for p values <.05. RESULTS: There are no significant differences among fluid filtration of the three sealers. The sealer/core material does not significantly influence the µPush-out bond strength values (F=2.49; p=0.10), although statistically significant differences were detected with regard to root level (Chi2=23.93; p<0.001). AH Plus and RealSeal obtained higher bond strength to intraradicular dentin in the medium root slices. CONCLUSIONS: There are no significant differences between the permeability and global µPush-out bond strength to root canal dentin achieved by AH Plus/gutta-percha, EndoREZ and RealSeal systems.
Colecciones
  • DE - Artículos

Mon compte

Ouvrir une sessionS'inscrire

Parcourir

Tout DIGIBUGCommunautés et CollectionsPar date de publicationAuteursTitresSujetsFinanciaciónPerfil de autor UGRCette collectionPar date de publicationAuteursTitresSujetsFinanciación

Statistiques

Statistiques d'usage de visualisation

Servicios

Pasos para autoarchivoAyudaLicencias Creative CommonsSHERPA/RoMEODulcinea Biblioteca UniversitariaNos puedes encontrar a través deCondiciones legales

Contactez-nous | Faire parvenir un commentaire