Ultrasound improves motor distal latency on patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Peris Moya, Alicia; Pérez Mármol, José Manuel; Khoury Martín, Elias F.; García Ríos, María Del CarmenEditorial
Edizioni Minerva Medica
Materia
Systematic review Meta-analysis Carpal tunnel syndrome
Fecha
2022-04Referencia bibliográfica
Peris Moya A, Pérez Mármol JM, Khoury Martín EF, García Ríos MC. Ultrasound improves motor distal latency on patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2022;58:206-17. DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.21.07021-0)
Resumen
INTRODUCTION: Is the application of ultrasound effective on pain, the severity of the symptoms, physical function, strength, and neurophysi- ological parameters of the median nerve conduction in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome?
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed by using a structured
search strategy in Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science and PEDro databases. All the primary studies included samples with carpal tunnel syn- drome treated by: ultrasound versus no treatment, therapeutic ultrasound versus sham ultrasound, ultrasound and usual care versus usual care, or ultrasound and other intervention versus the same intervention. The outcomes measures registered were pain, severity of symptoms, function, strength, and neurophysiological parameters (motor distal latency and sensory distal latency) of the median nerve. Methodological quality was evaluated by PEdro Scale.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Ten clinical trials met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Eight trials were meta-analyzed, which in cluded a total of 2069 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. The methodological quality of the included studies ranged among limited (5 trials), moderate (3 trials), and high (2 trials). In one of the electrophysiological parameters (motor distal latency), a significant difference between groups after the use of ultrasound was observed (MD=-0.10; fixed 95% CI=-0.20, -0.01; P=0.04). No significant differences between groups were observed at post-treatment for pain (P=0.29), severity of symptoms (P=0.99), function (P=0.54), strength (P=0.27) and for the rest of the electrophysiological parameters evaluated (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of ultrasound on patients with carpal tunnel syndrome seems to improve motor distal latency. This finding implies a partial improvement at the neurophysiological level, representing a reduction in the grade of clinical severity. Additional clinical trials with a high methodological quality are needed to investigate the doses at which ultrasound are most effective.




