Pain Outcome Determines the Sensitivity to Peripheral Opioid Antagonism of Morphine, Ibuprofen, and Their Combination in Laparotomized Mice
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Hasoun, Makeya A; Santos-Caballero, Miriam; Huerta, Miguel Á; Robles-Funes, María; Puerto Moya, Amada; Ruiz-Cantero, M Carmen; Cobos, Enrique J; González Cano, RafaelEditorial
MDPI
Materia
Postoperative pain laparotomy mechanical hypersensitivity
Fecha
2026-03-21Referencia bibliográfica
Hasoun, M. A., Santos-Caballero, M., Huerta, M. Á., Robles-Funes, M., Puerto-Moya, A., Ruiz-Cantero, M. C., Cobos, E. J., & González-Cano, R. (2026). Pain Outcome Determines the Sensitivity to Peripheral Opioid Antagonism of Morphine, Ibuprofen, and Their Combination in Laparotomized Mice. Pharmaceutics, 18(3), 392. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18030392
Patrocinador
MICIU/AEI/10.13039/50110001 1033 and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF, European Union) - (PID2023–150747OB-I00); “La Caixa” Foundation - (CaixaResearch Consolidate 2022-CC22–10176); Andalusian Regional Government - (grant CTS-109); University of Granada - (reference UCE-PP2017–05); Training University Lecturers Program, from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities - (FPU21/02736 and FPU23/03287) (FPI grants PRE2020–096203 and PRE2023–001628)Resumen
Background/Objectives: Postoperative pain pharmacology is complex. We investigated the sensitivity of analgesic-like effects induced by morphine, ibuprofen, and their combination to peripheral opioid antagonism in a mouse laparotomy model. Methods: Mechanical hypersensitivity was assessed using von Frey filaments, and ongoing pain (abdominal licking and facial expressions) was evaluated using artificial intelligence algorithms. We tested the sensitivity of the analgesic treatments to the opioid antagonist naloxone or its peripherally restricted analog, naloxone methiodide. We also tested the effects of neutrophil depletion using an anti-Ly6G antibody. Gastrointestinal transit and pupillary diameter were measured to assess non-analgesic opioid effects. Results: Morphine reversed all pain-related behaviors; its effect on mechanical hypersensitivity was reversed by peripheral opioid antagonism, whereas its effects on ongoing pain were not. Ibuprofen reduced mechanical hypersensitivity and facial expressions but failed to alter licking. Interestingly, the ibuprofen effect on mechanical hypersensitivity depended on peripheral opioid receptors and neutrophils at the injury site. The morphine–ibuprofen combination produced synergistic analgesia across all endpoints without enhancing opioid-induced gastrointestinal inhibition or mydriasis. Peripheral opioid antagonism reversed the effect of the combination on mechanical hypersensitivity and facial expressions but not on licking. Conclusions: Our results replicate the key clinical phenomena relevant to the postoperative pain context, including the potentiation of morphine analgesia by ibuprofen without the exacerbation of adverse effects. Our results suggest that drug effects on different postoperative pain measures rely on distinct neurobiological mechanisms and are not interchangeable. Therefore, the use of a battery of complementary pain endpoints in preclinical pharmacology studies is advisable.





