Seeing through space and time: Comparing the effects of exogenous spatial and rhythmic temporal attention on visual awareness
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemEditorial
Elsevier
Materia
Conscious perception Regularity Dynamic Attending Theory
Fecha
2026-03-14Referencia bibliográfica
Capizzi, M., Charras, P., & Chica, A. B. (2026). Seeing through space and time: Comparing the effects of exogenous spatial and rhythmic temporal attention on visual awareness. Consciousness and cognition, 141, 104040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2026.104040
Patrocinador
MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 (PID2021- 128696NA-I00), (PID2023-152001NB-I00 and PID2020- 119033GB-I00), (CEX2023-001312-M); ERDF/EU; Agence National de Recherche (ANR-18-CE28-0009-01); University of Granada UCE-PP2023-11; Spanish Ministry of Universities María Zambrano Fellowship; European Union NextGenerationResumen
Unlike spatial attention, the role of rhythmic temporal attention in visual awareness remains less explored. To
address this issue, we investigated how rhythmic temporal attention operates with exogenous spatial attention
during detection of near-threshold Gabor patch targets. Targets appeared after a series of placeholders flickering
either regularly or irregularly in the left or right visual field. Each target was equally likely to occur at the same
location as the rhythmic stream (spatially attended trial) or the opposite location (unattended trial). Participants
first made a detection response, followed by a localization judgment. Target visibility was calibrated to 50% in
Experiment 1 and 75% in Experiment 2. At 50% visibility, spatial attention induced a more conservative response
criterion for unattended compared to attended trials. Unexpectedly, irregular rhythms enhanced perceptual
sensitivity relative to regular rhythms. At 75% visibility, rhythms had no effect on perceptual sensitivity, whereas
spatial attention improved perceptual sensitivity, sped responses, and maintained a more conservative response
pattern for unattended trials. In follow-up experiments with fully visible (100%) targets, responses were faster
after regular rhythms, but only when the localization response was removed, suggesting that rhythmic temporal
sequences primarily facilitated response preparation under simplified task demands. Overall, these results call for
caution in attributing a direct role of rhythmic temporal attention to visual awareness, at least under the current
rhythmic sequences and in the presence of spatial uncertainty, while confirming a key role for exogenous spatial
attention in enhancing conscious perception.





