Electrophysiological signature of explicit and implicit timing
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Popolo Cristaldi, Fiorella Del; Micillo, Luigi; Capizzi, Mariagrazia; Cellini, Nicola; Mioni, GiovannaEditorial
Elsevier
Materia
Explicit timing Implicit timing Time bisection
Fecha
2026-04Referencia bibliográfica
Del Popolo Cristaldi, F., Micillo, L., Capizzi, M., Cellini, N., & Mioni, G. (2026). Electrophysiological signature of explicit and implicit timing. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 197, 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2026.02.002
Patrocinador
MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and ERDF/EU - (PID2021-128696NA-I00); University of Granada from the Spanish Ministry of Universities and the European Union NextGeneration - (María Zambrano Fellowship)Resumen
Temporal processing in the millisecond-to-seconds range underpins many cognitive and motor functions and can be engaged either explicitly or implicitly. Yet, the neural mechanisms distinguishing explicit and implicit timing remain debated. This study aimed to directly compare the electrophysiological (EEG) correlates of explicit and implicit timing. Participants performed an explicit timing task (time bisection task) and an implicit timing task (foreperiod task), matched for sensory and response demands. Analyses focused on early event-related potentials (N1/P2 complex), the Contingent Negative Variation (CNV), and beta-band oscillatory activity, all time-locked to cue onset and associated with anticipatory processes. Behavioural results confirmed robust foreperiod effects in implicit timing and accurate temporal discrimination in explicit timing. EEG results revealed larger N1/P2 and CNV amplitudes in the implicit timing task, particularly for longer intervals, suggesting greater expectation processes and motor preparatory demands. Time-frequency analyses showed stronger beta desynchronization during implicit timing. Furthermore, both N1/P2 and CNV amplitudes predicted behavioural performance across tasks, with CNV correlating more with sensitivity than perceived duration. These findings support largely overlapping neural dynamics for explicit and implicit timing with a prominent role of expectation and motor preparation processes, especially under implicit temporal task demands.





