Identifying Population Groups Based on Humanity Attribution to Low-, Middle- and High-Socioeconomic Status Groups: A Multilevel Latent Profile Analysis
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemEditorial
John Wiley & Sons
Materia
Dehumanisation Latent profiles Multilevel
Fecha
2026-02-17Referencia bibliográfica
Sainz, M., Martínez, R., & Lobato, R. M. (2026). Identifying population groups based on humanity attribution to low‐, middle‐ and high‐socioeconomic status groups: A multilevel latent profile analysis. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.70240
Patrocinador
MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and FEDER ‘A way to make Europe’ - (PID2022-136736NA-I00); MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 - (PID2022-140252NB-I00)(PID2022-140048NB-I00); Agencia Estatal de Inventigación - (AEI, PCI2020-112285) (PID2019-105643GB-I00); European Commission through Horizon 2020 Framework Programme - (No. 822166)Resumen
Despite growing research on (de)humanisation in the socioeconomic domain, the extent and diversity of these tendencies within the population remain unclear. This study used a representative sample of Spaniards (N = 1478) to examine the existence and prevalence of distinct dehumaniser profiles at both the individual (Level 1) and societal (Level 2) levels. We conducted a multilevel latent profile analysis using humanity attribution scores for low-, middle- and high-SES groups. At the individual level, five profiles emerged: high- (12%), middle- (27%) and low- (41%) generalised humanisers, high-SES dehumanisers (6%) and hierarchy legitimisers (13%). At the societal level, we identified three profiles: assimilators (52%), indifferents (7%) and unsettled (41%). Adherence to these profiles appeared to be influenced by participants' socioeconomic backgrounds or system justification and meritocracy, with profiles differing in their demand for social change. We discuss the applied relevance of mapping dehumanisation tendencies on the design of targeted interventions.





