• English 
    • español
    • English
    • français
  • FacebookPinterestTwitter
  • español
  • English
  • français
View Item 
  •   DIGIBUG Home
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Ecología
  • DEcología - Artículos
  • View Item
  •   DIGIBUG Home
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Ecología
  • DEcología - Artículos
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Mechanisms of prey size selection in a suspension-feeding copepod, Temora longicornis

[PDF] Gonçalves et al. - 2014 - Mechanisms of prey size selection in a suspension-.pdf (1.371Mb)
Identificadores
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10481/111550
DOI: 10.3354/meps11039
Exportar
RISRefworksMendeleyBibtex
Estadísticas
View Usage Statistics
Metadata
Show full item record
Author
Gonçalves, Rodrigo Javier; Hans, van Someren Gréve; Couespel, Damien; Thomas, Kiørboe
Date
2014-12-15
Referencia bibliográfica
Gonçalves, R. J., Hans van Someren Gréve, D. Couespel, and T. Kiørboe. “Mechanisms of Prey Size Selection in a Suspension-Feeding Copepod, Temora Longicornis.” Marine Ecology Progress Series 517 (December 2014): 61–74. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11039.
Abstract
We examined size-dependent prey detection and prey capture in free-swimming Temora longicornis using video observations, particle image velocimetry (PIV), and bottle incuba- tions with phytoplankton prey sizes within the range 6−60 µm equivalent spherical diameter (ESD). T. longicornis generates feeding currents by oscillating its appendages at about 25 Hz. Prey cells >10 µm ESD are perceived and captured individually. A capture response was elicited when prey was touched by (or within a few cell radii from) the setae on the feeding appendages. The extension of the setae defines the prey encounter cross section, which is therefore independent of prey size. The flux of water through the encounter area, estimated from PIV, was ca. 150 ml ind.−1 d−1, which represents the maximum possible clearance rates and was similar to that estimated in incubation experiments. However, while the detection probability was nearly 100% for cells >10−15 µm, it declined rapidly for smaller cells. Conversely, the probability that a cell which elicited a capture response was actually ingested declined with increased cell size, from nearly 100% for small cells, to ~0% for the largest cells examined. The resulting prey size spectrum, pre- dicted as the product of the cell-size-specific encounter rates and capture probabilities, was dome- shaped, with a maximum around 20−30 µm ESD. The prey size spectrum from incubation ex- periments had a similar shape and an optimum range of 30−50 µm ESD. The mechanistic underpinning of the prey size spectrum suggested here deviates from previous descriptions mainly in the mechanism and range of prey detection.
Collections
  • DEcología - Artículos

My Account

LoginRegister

Browse

All of DIGIBUGCommunities and CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectFinanciaciónAuthor profilesThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectFinanciación

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Servicios

Pasos para autoarchivoAyudaLicencias Creative CommonsSHERPA/RoMEODulcinea Biblioteca UniversitariaNos puedes encontrar a través deCondiciones legales

Contact Us | Send Feedback