The Early Safety Signal of Sacituzumab Govitecan-Related Toxicity and the UGT1A1*28 Genotype in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Real-World Preliminary Report
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Martínez Pérez, María; Nieto-Sánchez, María Teresa; Díaz Villamarín, Xando; Torres García, Alicia; Fernández Varón, Emilio; Prados-Carmona, Alvaro; Legerén, Marta; Cabeza-Barrera, José; Blancas López-Barajas, María Isabel; Morón Romero, María RocíoEditorial
MDPI
Materia
sacituzumab-govitecan UGT1A1*28 pharmacogenetics
Fecha
2026-02-24Referencia bibliográfica
Martínez-Pérez, M., Nieto-Sánchez, M. T., Díaz-Villamarín, X., Torres-García, A., Fernández-Varón, E., Prados-Carmona, A., Legerén, M., Cabeza-Barrera, J., Blancas, I., & Morón, R. (2026). The Early Safety Signal of Sacituzumab Govitecan-Related Toxicity and the UGT1A1*28 Genotype in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Real-World Preliminary Report. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 15(5), 1715. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15051715
Resumen
Background/Objectives: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) releases SN-38, the same active me
tabolite as irinotecan, thereby sharing key metabolic pathways and toxicity mechanisms.
The clearance of SN-38 is strongly influenced by UGT1A1 polymorphisms, particularly
the UGT1A1*28 allele. While UGT1A1*28 genotyping routinely guides irinotecan dosing,
no such recommendations exist for SG. This study describes the relationship between
UGT1A1*28 and severe SG-related toxicity in real-world practice, identifying early safety
signals and exploring the clinical and economic impact. Methods: This retrospective ob
servational study (2021–2025) included patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with
SG and patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies treated with irinotecan at a
tertiary hospital. In the SG cohort, genotyping followed grade ≥3 toxicity; in the irinotecan
cohort, it was performed prospectively. Toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Ad
verse Events version 5.0) and healthcare costs related to hospitalizations were estimated
using official institutional tariffs. Results: All nine SG patients with severe toxicity (100%)
carried the UGT1A1*28 allele. In the irinotecan cohort (n = 74), which was managed with
genotype-guided dosing, severe toxicity and hospitalization were less frequent. SG was
associated with higher mean costs per treated patient (€2817.01 vs. €1233.63), driven by
toxicity-related admissions (33.3% vs. 10.8%). Genotyping costs (€10.51) were negligible
compared to daily hospitalization expenses (up to €1984.90). Conclusions: Severe SG-re
lated toxicity reveals a consistent UGT1A1*28-associated vulnerability. Given the drug’s
recent approval in Spain, these data represent an urgent real-world safety signal. The
marked disparity between low genotyping costs and high hospitalization expenses sup
ports implementing preventive UGT1A1 testing to optimize the safety and sustainability
of sacituzumab govitecan therapy.





