• français 
    • español
    • English
    • français
  • FacebookPinterestTwitter
  • español
  • English
  • français
Voir le document 
  •   Accueil de DIGIBUG
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Filosofía I
  • DFI - Artículos
  • Voir le document
  •   Accueil de DIGIBUG
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Filosofía I
  • DFI - Artículos
  • Voir le document
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The Role of the Family in Deceased Organ Procurement: A Guide for Clinicians and Policymakers

[PDF] Artículo principal (554.2Ko)
[PDF] Información adicional (256.3Ko)
Identificadores
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10481/111085
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002622
Exportar
RISRefworksMendeleyBibtex
Estadísticas
Statistiques d'usage de visualisation
Metadatos
Afficher la notice complète
Auteur
Delgado Rodríguez, Janet; Molina Pérez, Alberto; Shaw, David; Rodríguez Arias Vailhen, David
Materia
Organ donation
 
Donación de órganos, tejidos, etc.
 
Family
 
Familia
 
Decision making
 
Informed consent
 
Presumed consent
 
Date
2019-05
Referencia bibliográfica
Delgado, J., Molina-Pérez, A., Shaw, D., & Rodríguez-Arias, D. (2019). The Role of the Family in Deceased Organ Procurement. A Guide for Clinicians and Policy Makers. Transplantation, 103(5), e112–e118. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000002622
Résumé
Families play an essential role in deceased organ procurement. As the person cannot directly communicate his or her wishes regarding donation, the family is often the only source of information regarding consent or refusal. We provide a systematic description and analysis of the different roles the family can play, and actions the family can take, in the organ procurement process across different jurisdictions and consent systems. First, families can inform or update healthcare professionals about a person’s donation wishes. Second, families can authorize organ procurement in the absence of deceased’s preferences and the default is not to remove organs, and oppose donation where there is no evidence of preference but the default is to presume consent; in both cases, the decision could be based on their own wishes or what they think the deceased would have wanted. Finally, families can overrule the known wishes of the deceased, which can mean preventing donation, or permitting donation when the deceased refused it. We propose a schema of 4 levels on which to map these possible family roles: no role, witness, surrogate, and full decisional authority. We conclude by mapping different jurisdictions onto this schema to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the consent system for organ donation and some important nuances about the role of families. This classificatory model aims to account for the majority of the world’s consent systems. It provides conceptual and methodological guidance that can be useful to researchers, professionals, and policymakers involved in organ procurement.
Colecciones
  • DFI - Artículos

Mon compte

Ouvrir une sessionS'inscrire

Parcourir

Tout DIGIBUGCommunautés et CollectionsPar date de publicationAuteursTitresSujetsFinanciaciónPerfil de autor UGRCette collectionPar date de publicationAuteursTitresSujetsFinanciación

Statistiques

Statistiques d'usage de visualisation

Servicios

Pasos para autoarchivoAyudaLicencias Creative CommonsSHERPA/RoMEODulcinea Biblioteca UniversitariaNos puedes encontrar a través deCondiciones legales

Contactez-nous | Faire parvenir un commentaire