Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorFernández Bayo, Jesús Dionisio
dc.contributor.authorYazdani, Ramin
dc.contributor.authorSimmons, Christopher W.
dc.contributor.authorVanderGheynst, Jean S.
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-11T08:47:52Z
dc.date.available2026-02-11T08:47:52Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationPublished version: Fernandez-Bayo, J.D., Ramin Yazdani, Christopher W. Simmons and Jean S. VanderGheynst (2018). Comparison of thermophilic anaerobic and aerobic treatment processes for stabilization of green and food wastes and production of soil amendments. Waste Management. Vol 77; 555-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.05.006es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/110855
dc.descriptionThis work was funded by the UC Davis Sustainability Research and Training Program and Diamond Developers under collaboration identification number 201500317, the National Institute of Food and Agriculture project CA-D-BAE-2228-RR, and the UC Laboratory Fees Research Program #12-LR-237496.es_ES
dc.description.abstractThe management of organic wastes is an environmental and social priority. Aerobic digestion (AED) or composting and anaerobic digestion (AD) are two organic waste management practices that produce a value-added final product. Few side-by-side comparisons of both technologies and their digestate products have been performed. The objective of this study was to compare the impact of initial feedstock properties (moisture content and/or C/N ratio) on stabilization rate by AED and AD and soil amendment characteristics of the final products. Green and food wastes were considered as they are two of the main contributors to municipal organic waste. Stabilization rate was assessed by measurement of CH4 and CO2 evolution for AD and AED, respectively. For AD, CH4 yield showed a second-order relationship with the C/N content (P < 0.05); the optimal C/N ratio indicated by the relationship was 25.5. For AED, cumulative CO2 evolution values were significantly affected by the C/N ratio and moisture content of the initial feedstock (P < 0.05). A response surface model showed optimal AED stabilization for a C/N of 25.6 and moisture of 64.9% (wet basis). AD final products presented lower soluble chemical oxygen demand (COD) but lower humification degree and aromaticity than the products from AED. This lower stability may lead to further degradation when amended to soil. The results suggest that composting feedstocks with higher C/N produces an end-product with higher suitability for soil amendment. The instability of end products from AD could be leveraged in pest control techniques that rely on organic matter degradation to produce compounds with pesticidal properties.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipUC Davis Sustainability Research and Training Program and Diamond Developers 201500317es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute of Food and Agriculture project CA-D-BAE-2228-RRes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipUC Laboratory Fees Research Program #12-LR-237496es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Licensees_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es_ES
dc.subjectAnaerobic digestiones_ES
dc.subjectcomposting es_ES
dc.subjectGreen Wastees_ES
dc.subjectFood wastees_ES
dc.titleComparison of thermophilic anaerobic and aerobic treatment processes for stabilization of green and food wastes and production of soil amendmentses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.wasman.2018.05.006
dc.type.hasVersionAMes_ES


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

[PDF]

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License