Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorHigueras Rodríguez, María Lina 
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz López, Johana
dc.contributor.authorMedina García, Marta
dc.contributor.authorLucena Rodríguez, Carmen 
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-20T10:20:16Z
dc.date.available2026-01-20T10:20:16Z
dc.date.issued2026-01-19
dc.identifier.citationHigueras Rodríguez, María Lina et al. Between Inclusion and Artificial Intelligence: A Study of the Training Gaps of University Teaching Staff in Spain. Educ. Sci. 2026, 16(1), 151; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010151es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/109944
dc.descriptionThis research was funded by the research project PPJIA2024-19, Proyectos de Investi-gación Precompetitivos para Jóvenes Investigadores, Modalidad A, funded by the Plan Propio de Investigación of the University of Granada. The programme is published by the Vicerrectorado de Investigación y Transferencia.es_ES
dc.description.abstractThis study analyzes how Spanish universities integrate inclusion, accessibility, digital competence, and artificial intelligence (AI) into the professional development of university teaching staff, in a context marked by rapid digital transformation. The research addresses the lack of comparative evidence on how these key dimensions of contemporary higher education are articulated, or remain disconnected, across institutions. Using a mixed-methods design, 83 training courses delivered between 2020 and 2025 in 24 public and private universities were examined through qualitative analysis, coding matrices, and hierarchical cluster analysis. The study adopts an explicitly exploratory and typological approach, aimed at mapping institutional patterns rather than establishing causal explanations. The results reveal a highly heterogeneous and weakly cohesive training landscape. Inclusion appears primarily as a normative discourse with limited pedagogical depth; accessibility is frequently reduced to technical compliance; and AI (particularly generative AI) is incorporated from instrumental, efficiency-oriented approaches. Ethical dimensions, algorithmic bias, and digital accessibility are virtually absent. The hierarchical cluster analysis identifies four institutional profiles: technocentric without inclusion, analogically inclusive, advanced hybrid, and low-density training models. These patterns show how institutional orientations shape the professional development trajectories of university teaching staff. The study highlights the need for comprehensive faculty development strategies that integrate inclusion, accessibility, and responsible AI use, and offers a structured typological baseline for future research assessing impact on teaching practice and student experience.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Granada PPJIA2024-19es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectgenerative AIes_ES
dc.subjectfaculty developmentes_ES
dc.subjectinclusive educationes_ES
dc.subjectaccessibilityes_ES
dc.subjectdigital competencees_ES
dc.titleBetween Inclusion and Artificial Intelligence: A Study of the Training Gaps of University Teaching Staff in Spaines_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/educsci16010151
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License