Glyph norming: Human and computational measurements of shape angularity in writing systems
Identificadores
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10481/109933Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Porto, Alexander; Huckle, Nikolai; Basalyga, Alexander; Santiago De Torres, Julio Ramón; Kranjec, AlexanderMateria
writing systems Stimuli development Computational shape analysis Cognitive linguistics
Fecha
2025Referencia bibliográfica
Porto, A., Huckle, N., Basalyga, A., Santiago, J., & Kranjec, A. (2025). Glyph norming: Human and computational measurements of shape angularity in writing systems. Behavior Research Methods, 57, 173.
Resumen
Writing systems are an underused source of stimuli for behavioral and computational experiments in cognitive psychology,
psycholinguistics, and anthropology, despite being ecologically relevant and systematically different in shape, structure, and
orientation. One possible reason that glyphs of writing systems are not commonly used in behavioral research concerns their
profound complexity. However, recent developments in computer vision (i.e., geometric shape analysis) offer tools to automati-
cally assess their visual dimensions. The current work describes an open-access database of 3,208 glyphs from diverse writing
systems that have been normed by computational analyses in terms of shape angularity using an array of measurements. We
further validate these norms by obtaining human judgments of angularity for a subset of 400 glyphs and show that they correlate
highly with computational measures, in particular with first-order entropy of edge orientation. Additionally, we provide methods
for standardized glyph generation based on Unicode ranges, a straightforward example of computational shape analysis, and a
demonstration of automated transliteration of glyphs from Unicode strings using a pre-existing Python library. These procedures
should facilitate the characterization of angularity of new glyphs and any other kind of visual shape by independent researchers.
The present work will be helpful to scientists working across different topics in the various cognitive science subdisciplines.





