• español 
    • español
    • English
    • français
  • FacebookPinterestTwitter
  • español
  • English
  • français
Ver ítem 
  •   DIGIBUG Principal
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Educación Física y Deportiva
  • DEFD - Artículos
  • Ver ítem
  •   DIGIBUG Principal
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Educación Física y Deportiva
  • DEFD - Artículos
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Analysis of the Competitive Weekly Microcycle in Elite Soccer: Comparison of Workload Behavior in Absolute and Relative Terms

[PDF] artículo principal (713.8Kb)
Identificadores
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10481/109929
DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004219
Exportar
RISRefworksMendeleyBibtex
Estadísticas
Ver Estadísticas de uso
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Autor
Guerrero Calderón, Bernardo; Fradua Uriondo, Juan Luis; Morcillo, Jose A.; Castillo Rodríguez, Alfonso
Fecha
2022
Resumen
This study aimed to analyze the locomotion activity of elite-level soccer players throughout the weekly microcycle by playing position, and compare the training-load (TL) behavior in relation tomatch-play in absolute and relative (meters or events per minute) terms. Training and match data were collected from 30 professional soccer players belonging to a Spanish First Division teamduring the 2015/2016 season using global positioning technology (152 training sessions and 38 matches). Overall, the results showed a decrease of TL metrics when competition approached (p , 0.05). However, a progressive decrease was not found for all metrics. Two-way analysis of variance test revealed that workload was affected by the interaction between microcycle-day and season period showingmedium or large effect size (h2 p .0.15) for all positions andmetrics.Considering the TL in relation to the match-load, opposite load behavior was found in absolute and relative terms by position; whereas, central-defenders, external-defenders, and forwards covered 21, 25 and 26% more absolute medium-speed running distance (MSRD), respectively; central-defenders covered 14% (8.6–13.4 m·min21), external-defenders 10% (7.5–13.9 m·min2 1), and forwards 7% (8.4–15.7 m·min21) more relative-MSRD 4 days before match than match-day. The accelerations-metric also showed higher relative values 4, 3, and 2 days before the match. Because the objective of the training is to prepare players to withstand the competition demands, analyzing the position-specific TL concerning to match demands represents an advantageous strategy for training periodization. In addition, this study highlights the importance of taking into account the time spent of developing the different efforts to properly define the position-specific physical demands.
Colecciones
  • DEFD - Artículos

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro

Listar

Todo DIGIBUGComunidades y ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriaFinanciaciónPerfil de autor UGREsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriaFinanciación

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

Servicios

Pasos para autoarchivoAyudaLicencias Creative CommonsSHERPA/RoMEODulcinea Biblioteca UniversitariaNos puedes encontrar a través deCondiciones legales

Contacto | Sugerencias