Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorLix, C.
dc.contributor.authorZuddas, Pierpaolo
dc.contributor.authorGuichet, X.
dc.contributor.authorBenavente Herrera, José 
dc.contributor.authorLuque Espinar, Juan Antonio
dc.contributor.authorBarbier, M.
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-19T10:42:28Z
dc.date.available2026-01-19T10:42:28Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationLix, C. et al. Science of the Total Environment, 705: 135652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135652es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/109872
dc.descriptionThis work was supported by IFPEN and Sorbonne Université. We also thank the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia – Palermo (INGV) for gas analyses.es_ES
dc.description.abstractThere is growing interest in geothermal energy, which is considered as an efficient energy solution to mitigate rising atmospheric CO2. Besides known high enthalpy geothermal systems, increasing attention is paid to low temperature geothermal systems, as they are suitable for local use. Although geothermal production seems to be an environmentally advantageous renewable energy, it might result in significant CO2 emissions. In this study, we investigate the relationship between temperature, fugacity of CO2 (fCO2), and mineral buffers in the reservoir conditions, taking the low- to medium- enthalpy thermal waters in the Central Betic Cordillera as case study. Using geochemical modeling, three main groups of waters have been identified depending on temperature, buffering mineral assemblage, and fCO2 in their reservoir. A group of waters with a reservoir temperature ranging from 70 to 90 °C and located in the intramountain sedimentary basins shows a fCO2 in depth ranging from ~6 × 10−2 and 6 × 10−1. The reservoir chemistry of this water group seems to be mainly controlled by carbonates and evaporites displaying a fCO2 variation between depth and surface (ΔfCO2) of 10−1. Another intermediate group of waters, located in an active extension zone, displays lower temperature (50–60 °C) and fCO2 in the reservoir (from 10−3 to 10−2). Finally, the third group of waters, located on the metamorphic complexes contacts, show the highest estimated temperatures (130–140 °C) and fCO2 in the reservoir (1 to 102). The two latter groups suggest increasing buffering effect of alumino-silicates, in addition to carbonates and quartz. Therefore, we evidenced a strong relationship between temperature and fCO2 in the reservoir as well as the potential mineral buffers. We discussed the potential of geothermal systems as clean energy source based on the estimation of the CO2 emissions generated by the investigated thermal systems for a practical case of household heating.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipIFPENes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipSorbonne Universitées_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia – Palermo (INGV)es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectGeothermal systemes_ES
dc.subjectCO2es_ES
dc.subjectGeothermometryes_ES
dc.titleRole of CO2 in low to medium enthalpy geothermal systems in the Central Betic Cordillera (Spain)es_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135652
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional