Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorGavira Gallardo, José Antonio 
dc.contributor.authorMatilla, Miguel A.
dc.contributor.authorFernández Rodríguez, Matilde 
dc.contributor.authorKrell, Tino
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-15T11:14:37Z
dc.date.available2026-01-15T11:14:37Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationGavira JA, Matilla MA, Fernández M, Krell T. The structural basis for signal promiscuity in a bacterial chemoreceptor. FEBS J. 2021 Apr;288(7):2294-2310. doi: 10.1111/febs.15580es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2294-2310
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/109743
dc.descriptionWe greatly appreciate the provision of beam time at ALBA and ESRF and the support of the beam-line staff during data collection. This work was supported by FEDER funds and Fondo Social Europeo through grants from the Spanish Ministry for Science, Innovation and Universities to MAM (PID2019-103972GAI00), and the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness to JAG (BIO2016-74875-P) and TK (BIO2016-76779-P).es_ES
dc.description.abstractSignalling through chemosensory pathways is typically initiated by thebinding of signal molecules to the chemoreceptor ligand binding domain(LBD). The PcaY_PP chemoreceptor from Pseudomonas putida KT2440 ischaracterized by an unusually broad signal range, and minimal requisitesfor signal binding are the presence of a C6-membered ring and that of acarboxyl group. Previous studies have shown that only some of the multi-ple signals recognized by this chemoreceptor are of apparent metabolicvalue. We report here high-resolution structures of PcaY_PP-LBD in theabsence and presence of four cognate chemoeffectors and glycerol. Thedomain formed a four-helix bundle (4HB), and both ligand binding sites ofthe dimer were occupied with the high-affinity ligands protocatechuate andquinate, whereas the lower-affinity ligands benzoate and salicylate werepresent in only one site. Ligand binding was verified by microcalorimetrictitration of site-directed mutants revealing important roles of an arginineand number of polar residues that establish an extensive hydrogen bondingnetwork with bound ligands. The comparison of the apo and holo struc-tures did not provide evidence for this receptor employing a transmem-brane signalling mechanism that involves piston-like shifts of the finalhelix. Instead, ligand binding caused rigid-body scissoring movements ofboth monomers of the dimer. Comparisons with the 4HB domains of theTar and Tsr chemoreceptors revealed significant structural differences.Importantly, the ligand binding site in PcaY_PP-LBD is approximately8 A removed from that of the Tar and Tsr receptors. Data indicate a sig-nificant amount of structural and functional diversity among 4HBdomains.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipSpanish Ministry for Science, Innovation and Universities, PID2019-103972GAI00es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipSpanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, BIO2016-74875-P and BIO2016-76779-Pes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWileyes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectChemoreceptorses_ES
dc.subjectChemotaxises_ES
dc.subjectLigand recognitiones_ES
dc.titleThe structural basis for signal promiscuity in a bacterial chemoreceptores_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/febs.15580
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional